On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 20:35 -0300, Miguel Griffa wrote:
> in svn it'd be easy, but in cvs it'd be quite difficult, the 'newest'
> file may be a 1.2 revision, 
> mixing a little development process and policies, one could ask to
> write the revision id of the pom.xml, since that file should change at
> least once on each release, and thus, would be a valid identifier for
> the 'build number', IMHO this is an acceptable thing to ask 

Yeah, I think that would be good enough. 

It could also include information like the current date, host machine
that built the artifact and stuff like that.

--
Trygve


Reply via email to