On 2/11/06, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 20:35 -0300, Miguel Griffa wrote: > > in svn it'd be easy, but in cvs it'd be quite difficult, the 'newest' > > file may be a 1.2 revision, > > mixing a little development process and policies, one could ask to > > write the revision id of the pom.xml, since that file should change at > > least once on each release, and thus, would be a valid identifier for > > the 'build number', IMHO this is an acceptable thing to ask > > Yeah, I think that would be good enough.
Some people have the habit of modifying a file for each build as part of their Continuous Integration process. It is not necessarily the pom.xml. If you make it so that the file can be specified (and by default pom.xml), then that should cover 99.999% cases. Jerome
