I plan to start a vote on the adopting
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal
to
replace our current document
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer tomorrow
(Monday).

- Carin

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:32 AM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for publishing the notes and also thanks everyone for providing
> valuable feedback and discussion.
>
> I encourage everyone that has ideas for improvement to the document to
> feel free to edit and revise. If you need a login to the wiki, please just
> ask.
>
> Also, while editing, please keep in mind that the intent is to have a vote
> on adopting the new
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal
> to replace our current document
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer
> before a vote on separating levels of committer and PPMC as a process. So,
> if possible, adopting wording that would work in either outcome of that
> vote.
>
> On the subject of voting, I was thinking of starting a vote on Friday, but
> will delay that until the active discussions and revisions are complete.
>
> Best,
> Carin
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 6:39 AM Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This is the first hangout that I was able to attend, I liked the format
>> and
>> found them valuable. Thanks for organizing and publishing the notes.
>> Looking forward to the next one.
>>
>> Pedro
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 6:44 AM Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Carin - please see
>> >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Hangout+October+24th+2018+8am+and+5pm+PDT
>> > :
>> > Discussion about committer proposal:
>> >
>> >    - Proposal default should be to have separation between committer and
>> >    PPMC election
>> >    - Criteria are vague, should we add some example persona?
>> >    - Spell out privileges of committer and PPMC member
>> >
>> >
>> > Note: I update the project proposal to address first bullet.
>> >
>> > Steffen
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:29 AM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > A request to whoever is taking notes at the MXNet Hangouts that are
>> > > occurring today. Could you please recap feedback from the meeting in
>> > > regards to document revisions here for everyone? I would like to
>> attend
>> > the
>> > > session later today, but may not due to family obligations.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > > Carin
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 2:24 PM Steffen Rochel <
>> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Carin - I got feedback on my proposal and made changes. I
>> incorporated
>> > > > Tianqi's suggesiton that we should strive to nominate committer/PPMC
>> > > > candidates from outside ones own organization. It should not be
>> > > considered
>> > > > as a hard rule, but recommendation.
>> > > >
>> > > > Steffen
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:18 PM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Thanks Steffen helping draft up the proposal for Committer and
>> PPMC
>> > > > > guidelines.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Please everyone review and provide feedback
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+(incubating)+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal
>> > > > > .
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I plan to start a vote on this Friday if the discussions/revisions
>> > are
>> > > > > complete.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Carin
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:03 PM Carin Meier <
>> carinme...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Great!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I started a rough draft for collaboration at
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+a+Committer+Proposal
>> > > > > > .
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Everyone feel free to enhance and provide feedback.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > - Carin
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:55 AM Steffen Rochel <
>> > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> +1, great suggestion, thanks Carin!
>> > > > > >> I'm willing to collaborate to create a draft proposal.
>> > > > > >> Steffen
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 5:35 AM Carin Meier <
>> carinme...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> > Background:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > There is a desire to increase the committer pool and grow the
>> > > > > community.
>> > > > > >> > This thread is to discuss the possibility of revision the
>> > current
>> > > > > >> committer
>> > > > > >> > criteria in light of the following goals:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > - Make it easier to newcomers to be committers
>> > > > > >> > - Recognize non-code contributions as paths to committership
>> > > > > >> > - Open the door to separating levels of committer and PMC
>> > > (discussed
>> > > > > in
>> > > > > >> > another thread)
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > Current State:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > The current committer criteria is here
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer
>> > > > > >> as
>> > > > > >> > is modeled after the Hadoop committer criteria
>> > > > > >> > https://hadoop.apache.org/committer_criteria.html
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > Proposal:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > Model the MXNet path to committership and PMC after the
>> Apache
>> > > Beam
>> > > > > >> project
>> > > > > >> > https://beam.apache.org/contribute/become-a-committer/
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > Short quote from page:
>> > > > > >> >       =================
>> > > > > >> > An Apache Beam committer…
>> > > > > >> > <
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/become-a-committer/#an-apache-beam-committer
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >    - Takes many forms
>> > > > > >> >    <
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/become-a-committer/#takes-many-forms
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >    - Knows, upholds, and reinforces the Apache Software
>> > Foundation
>> > > > > code
>> > > > > >> of
>> > > > > >> >    conduct
>> > > > > >> >    <
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/become-a-committer/#knows-upholds-and-reinforces-the-apache-software-foundation-code-of-conduct
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> >    - Knows, upholds, and reinforces the responsibilities of
>> an
>> > > > Apache
>> > > > > >> >    Software Foundation committer
>> > > > > >> >    <
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/become-a-committer/#knows-upholds-and-reinforces-the-responsibilities-of-an-apache-software-foundation-committer
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> >    - Knows, upholds, and reinforces the Beam community’s
>> > practices
>> > > > > >> >    <
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/become-a-committer/#knows-upholds-and-reinforces-the-beam-communitys-practices
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> >    - =================
>> > > > > >> >    <
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/become-a-committer/#knows-upholds-and-reinforces-the-beam-communitys-practices
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > I believe if we merge our current committer criteria with
>> this
>> > > model
>> > > > > it
>> > > > > >> > will open  the path to committership to a wider pool,
>> > acknowledge
>> > > > that
>> > > > > >> > there are multiple paths, and reinforce the ASF values and
>> > > > > >> > responsibilities.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > The Beam model does not explicitly address a PMC level but we
>> > > could
>> > > > > add
>> > > > > >> it
>> > > > > >> > in in the same spirit of reinforcing the ASF responsibilities
>> > and
>> > > > > >> values of
>> > > > > >> > this level.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > Looking forward to feedback about this possible direction. If
>> > the
>> > > > > >> community
>> > > > > >> > is interested looking more into this direction I would be
>> happy
>> > to
>> > > > > >> create
>> > > > > >> > of first draft of something more concrete to look at - (or if
>> > > > someone
>> > > > > >> else
>> > > > > >> > wants to take a crack at it too that would be great)
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > - Carin
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to