>My limitRendered is pretty much not going to change (feature >complete), would this be a good candidate to promote as well or should >it be considered for the commons project instead?
Yes, you are right. Has doc, site doc and the examples works with RI and Myfaces. It was a typo error on my list to not include it. >Will DOJO be optional for tomahawk or will promoting these components >force more 3rd party library dependencies to be added to tomahawk >(regarding the Ajax components)? I don't know if move DOJO components force more 3rd party library dependencies to be added to tomahawk (The only component actually in tomahawk is t:dojoInitializer). We can do a commons module for DOJO (sometime ago there was a proposal in that sense). One question is if the DOJO sandbox components should be developed first on sandbox and then moved to that commons module. We can reference the component on the tld of tomahawk, but the hypotetical DOJO commons module jar should be referenced too. How we can do this optional?
