+1 sounds good to me

2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>:
> so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ?
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann
> <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I would prefer
>>
>> /trunk -> 2.0
>> /branches/myfaces-1.1.x
>> /branches/myfaces-1.2.x
>>
>> because we are not using cvs anymore
>>
>> and the path already contains
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/
>>
>> maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> 
>> wrote:
>>> actually, I agree with Bernd.
>>>
>>> For the following layout:
>>>
>>> /trunk -> 2.0
>>> /branches/myfaces_1_1_x
>>> /branches/myfaces_1_2_x
>>>
>>> Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk:
>>> -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec)
>>> -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk)
>>>
>>>
>>> So, I am +1 on the above "svn layout"
>>>
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> from Bernd, on a different thread:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest following layout
>>>>
>>>> 1.1.x branch/1.1.x
>>>> 1.2.x branch/1.2.x
>>>> 2.0.x trunk
>>>>
>>>> because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are
>>>> only in bugfix state.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, I filed this:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ...
>>>>>>> (since we already work on 2.0.x....)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes "trunk"
>>>>>> And the following efforts are on a branch:
>>>>>> -2.0.x
>>>>>> -1.1.x
>>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>

Reply via email to