that would be great ! Thx Leo! -Matthias
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Leonardo Uribe<lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and > make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous > emails the suggested layout is this: > > /trunk -> 2.0 > /branches/1.1.x > /branches/1.2.x > > If no objections I'll do the necessary changes on svn (note that to do this > change we need to update nightly build configuration and I can't help with > that). > > regards > > Leonardo Uribe > > > 2009/5/28 Simon Lessard <simon.lessar...@gmail.com> >> >> +1 >> >> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> sure! >>> >>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary >>> > steps >>> > for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is >>> > possible to delay this change after the release. >>> > >>> > regards >>> > >>> > Leonardo Uribe >>> > >>> > 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civ...@gmail.com> >>> >> >>> >> +1 for sure >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda <brunoara...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 sounds good to me >>> >>> >>> >>> 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>: >>> >>> > so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts >>> >>> > become >>> >>> > trunk ? >>> >>> > >>> >>> > -Matthias >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann >>> >>> > <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com> wrote: >>> >>> >> Hello, >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> +1 >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I would prefer >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> /trunk -> 2.0 >>> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.1.x >>> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.2.x >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> because we are not using cvs anymore >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> and the path already contains >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Regards >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Bernd >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> >> <mat...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> actually, I agree with Bernd. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> For the following layout: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> /trunk -> 2.0 >>> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_1_x >>> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_2_x >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: >>> >>> >>> -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) >>> >>> >>> -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it >>> >>> >>> trunk) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> So, I am +1 on the above "svn layout" >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> >>> <mat...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> from Bernd, on a different thread: >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> Hello, >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> I would suggest following layout >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> 1.1.x branch/1.1.x >>> >>> >>>> 1.2.x branch/1.2.x >>> >>> >>>> 2.0.x trunk >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches >>> >>> >>>> are >>> >>> >>>> only in bugfix state. >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz >>> >>> >>>> <werner.p...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> Hi, >>> >>> >>>>>> ... >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> Ok, I filed this: >>> >>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a >>> >>> >>>>>>> branch ... >>> >>> >>>>>>> (since we already work on 2.0.x....) >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes "trunk" >>> >>> >>>>>> And the following efforts are on a branch: >>> >>> >>>>>> -2.0.x >>> >>> >>>>>> -1.1.x >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> +1 >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > -- >>> >>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> > >>> >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
