sure! On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary steps > for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is > possible to delay this change after the release. > > regards > > Leonardo Uribe > > 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civ...@gmail.com> >> >> +1 for sure >> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda <brunoara...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> +1 sounds good to me >>> >>> 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>: >>> > so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become >>> > trunk ? >>> > >>> > -Matthias >>> > >>> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann >>> > <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com> wrote: >>> >> Hello, >>> >> >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> I would prefer >>> >> >>> >> /trunk -> 2.0 >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.1.x >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.2.x >>> >> >>> >> because we are not using cvs anymore >>> >> >>> >> and the path already contains >>> >> >>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ >>> >> >>> >> maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. >>> >> >>> >> Regards >>> >> >>> >> Bernd >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >>> >> <mat...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> actually, I agree with Bernd. >>> >>> >>> >>> For the following layout: >>> >>> >>> >>> /trunk -> 2.0 >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_1_x >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_2_x >>> >>> >>> >>> Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: >>> >>> -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) >>> >>> -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> So, I am +1 on the above "svn layout" >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> <mat...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> from Bernd, on a different thread: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Hello, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I would suggest following layout >>> >>>> >>> >>>> 1.1.x branch/1.1.x >>> >>>> 1.2.x branch/1.2.x >>> >>>> 2.0.x trunk >>> >>>> >>> >>>> because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are >>> >>>> only in bugfix state. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Hi, >>> >>>>>> ... >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Ok, I filed this: >>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a >>> >>>>>>> branch ... >>> >>>>>>> (since we already work on 2.0.x....) >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes "trunk" >>> >>>>>> And the following efforts are on a branch: >>> >>>>>> -2.0.x >>> >>>>>> -1.1.x >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>> +1 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>>> >>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>> > >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> > >> > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
