+1

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>wrote:

> sure!
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary
> steps
> > for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is
> > possible to delay this change after the release.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Leonardo Uribe
> >
> > 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civ...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> +1 for sure
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda <brunoara...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1 sounds good to me
> >>>
> >>> 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>:
> >>> > so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become
> >>> > trunk ?
> >>> >
> >>> > -Matthias
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann
> >>> > <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com> wrote:
> >>> >> Hello,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> +1
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I would prefer
> >>> >>
> >>> >> /trunk -> 2.0
> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.1.x
> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.2.x
> >>> >>
> >>> >> because we are not using cvs anymore
> >>> >>
> >>> >> and the path already contains
> >>> >>
> >>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/
> >>> >>
> >>> >> maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Regards
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Bernd
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
> >>> >> <mat...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> >>> actually, I agree with Bernd.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> For the following layout:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> /trunk -> 2.0
> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_1_x
> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_2_x
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk:
> >>> >>> -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec)
> >>> >>> -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk)
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> So, I am +1 on the above "svn layout"
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> -Matthias
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
> >>> >>> <mat...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> >>>> from Bernd, on a different thread:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Hello,
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> I would suggest following layout
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> 1.1.x branch/1.1.x
> >>> >>>> 1.2.x branch/1.2.x
> >>> >>>> 2.0.x trunk
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are
> >>> >>>> only in bugfix state.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz <
> werner.p...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>> >>>>>> ...
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> Ok, I filed this:
> >>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a
> >>> >>>>>>> branch ...
> >>> >>>>>>> (since we already work on 2.0.x....)
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes "trunk"
> >>> >>>>>> And the following efforts are on a branch:
> >>> >>>>>> -2.0.x
> >>> >>>>>> -1.1.x
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>> +1
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> --
> >>> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> --
> >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >>> >
> >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>

Reply via email to