I second what mike said.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Mike Kienenberger<mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd strongly prefer to see JUL instead of something else (including > JCL) now that it's part of the standard. In Ganesh-speak, +0.9 JUL, > -0.9 slf4j > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> The only downside I see is that we might break compatibility for java >>> 1.4 since JUL gut some overhaul between 1.4 and 5, but on the other hand >>> is it really important anymore? >>> Which projects still have to be on 1.4 >> >> In 1.4.2 the log methods in question were already there. So - as a logging >> user only - this might not be a problem. >> >> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/util/logging/Logger.html >> >> >> Ciao, >> Mario >> > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
