Hi,
> we could also vote first about slf4j and everybody who prefers jul
should vote -1
> if we don't have a majority for slf4j, we have to vote about jul.
> is that ok for everybody?
From http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html my understanding of a
-1 vote is different from this.
<< Vetos
A code-modification proposal may be stopped dead in its tracks by a -1
vote by a qualified voter. This constitutes a veto, and it cannot be
overruled nor overridden by anyone. Vetos stand until and unless
withdrawn by their casters.
To prevent vetos from being used capriciously, they must be accompanied
by a technical justification showing why the change is bad (opens a
security exposure, negatively affects performance, etc.). A veto without
a justification is invalid and has no weight. >>
Better use the fraction system for voting on the logging system:
* +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okey with this.'
* -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'
* -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational
justification for my feelings.'
* ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!'
* -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the
way if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.'
* +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have
time/the skills necessary to help out.'
Best regards,
Ganesh
