was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this..
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman <michael.freed...@oracle.com> wrote: > Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. > This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet > 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was > finalized/approved by the JCP last month. > > Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven > project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag > associated with version of the TCK: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 > > Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for > convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project > > These components can be inspected in > http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ > > I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be > built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the > subversion tag. > > Please review these materials and vote. > > ------------------------------------------------ > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, > and why.............. > > Thanks, > -Mike- > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
