+1 Good work Mike
On 01/13/2011 11:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Michael Freedman
<michael.freed...@oracle.com> wrote:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and
a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/.
The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run the
TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and are
included in the various .wars that get built as part of building/running the
TCK.
Please revote on this new distributable:
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why.............
On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE
on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct?
In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0
(portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf<mat...@apache.org>
was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure?
MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this..
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman
<michael.freed...@oracle.com> wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK.
This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to
Portlet
2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was
finalized/approved by the JCP last month.
Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven
project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion
tag
associated with version of the TCK:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0
Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for
convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project
These components can be inspected in
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can
be
built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the
subversion tag.
Please review these materials and vote.
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..............
Thanks,
-Mike-
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
