+1 2011/1/14 Grant Smith <work.gr...@gmail.com>
> +1 > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> +1 >> Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman: >> >>> Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project >>> and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: >>> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/> >>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ >>> >. >>> >>> >>> The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run >>> the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and >>> are included in the various .wars that get built as part of >>> building/running the TCK. >>> >>> Please revote on this new distributable: >>> ------------------------------------------------ >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, >>> and why............. >>> >>> On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / >>>> NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? >>>> >>>> In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 >>>> (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> >>>> Leonardo Uribe >>>> >>>> 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org >>>> <mailto:mat...@apache.org>> >>>> >>>> >>>> was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release >>>> procedure? >>>> MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman >>>> <michael.freed...@oracle.com <mailto:michael.freed...@oracle.com>> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge >>>> 2.0.0 TCK. >>>> > This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to >>>> Portlet >>>> > 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was >>>> > finalized/approved by the JCP last month. >>>> > >>>> > Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the >>>> maven >>>> > project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the >>>> subversion tag >>>> > associated with version of the TCK: >>>> > >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 >>>> > >>>> > Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. >>>> However, for >>>> > convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project >>>> > >>>> > These components can be inspected in >>>> > >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/> >>>> < >>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the >>>> TCK can be >>>> > built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in >>>> the >>>> > subversion tag. >>>> > >>>> > Please review these materials and vote. >>>> > >>>> > ------------------------------------------------ >>>> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >>>> > [ ] +0 >>>> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be >>>> released, >>>> > and why.............. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > -Mike- >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > > > -- > Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology > Marathon Computer Systems, LLC. > >
