+1 On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman: > >> Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project >> and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: >> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/>. >> >> >> The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run >> the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and >> are included in the various .wars that get built as part of >> building/running the TCK. >> >> Please revote on this new distributable: >> ------------------------------------------------ >> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, >> and why............. >> >> On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / >>> NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? >>> >>> In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 >>> (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Leonardo Uribe >>> >>> 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org >>> <mailto:mat...@apache.org>> >>> >>> >>> was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release >>> procedure? >>> MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman >>> <michael.freed...@oracle.com <mailto:michael.freed...@oracle.com>> >>> >>> wrote: >>> > Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge >>> 2.0.0 TCK. >>> > This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to >>> Portlet >>> > 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was >>> > finalized/approved by the JCP last month. >>> > >>> > Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the >>> maven >>> > project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the >>> subversion tag >>> > associated with version of the TCK: >>> > >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 >>> > >>> > Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. >>> However, for >>> > convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project >>> > >>> > These components can be inspected in >>> > >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/> >>> < >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/> >>> >>> > >>> > I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the >>> TCK can be >>> > built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the >>> > subversion tag. >>> > >>> > Please review these materials and vote. >>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------ >>> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >>> > [ ] +0 >>> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be >>> released, >>> > and why.............. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > -Mike- >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>> > > -- Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology Marathon Computer Systems, LLC.
