Would be a nice improvement -M
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Matthias and I spoke offline a bit and I think it merits writing up a JIRA > which would allow us to have stuff in the repo so that projects can include > it. I'm not sure how feasible this is, given that the TCK needs to run > against a native portal environment, but I certainly wouldn't be opposed to > someone researching this. > > For now though, I think the release looks good provided we get the LISCENCE > and NOTICE files straightened out. > > On 01/13/2011 10:05 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >> there is a reason . the bits are no maven artifacts, so there is no >> need to deploy them to central >> (and we never did that). >> >> Michale, >> using your private URL is fine; Once the release is done, we will >> continue the regular process. where the bits >> 'just' got deployed to the MyFaces (Portal TCK) site >> >> -M >> >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Matthias Wessendorf<mat...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? >>> MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman >>> <michael.freed...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. >>>> This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to >>>> Portlet >>>> 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was >>>> finalized/approved by the JCP last month. >>>> >>>> Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven >>>> project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion >>>> tag >>>> associated with version of the TCK: >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 >>>> >>>> Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for >>>> convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project >>>> >>>> These components can be inspected in >>>> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ >>>> >>>> I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can >>>> be >>>> built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the >>>> subversion tag. >>>> >>>> Please review these materials and vote. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------ >>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, >>>> and why.............. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Mike- >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
