Hi all, I would like to express my disappointment too. I saw the slides of the presentation, and even the title is deceiving to my eyes. This presentation attempts to tell you that OOoAuthors is "THE" way to contribute to documentation. What OOoAuthors may not tell you is that there are other ways to contribute to documentation. While I can certainly appreciate Daniel's attempt to answer to difficulty of using our site's tools, I think it would certainly have been better if he had put his talent and energy at teaching people how to use OOo's site tools (cvs, mailing lists)rather than coming up with an external site and incompatible licences. By the way, one should be aware that by contributing works to OOoAuthors, he/she will not be able to have it included in the official documentation corpus of OOo. I only hope that all the OOoAuthors contributors will realize that their only chance is that the Community Council accepts the CC's licensing scheme.
Anyway. I totally agree with Sophie. The wording on OOoAuthors makes a good job denegating the very existence of the fr documentation community, and it is simply unacceptable. But Daniel knows all this since he does that ON PURPOSE. OOoAuthors is a community fork, despite the amount of work some people inside or outside the NLC have invested in it. Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
