Hi André, Thank you for the valuable comment.
I also expected the deficit you points since some or all entries in some files named localize.sdf are probably obsolete or no longer used. e.g. issue 60607 tries to look into the facts. So the actual value of the coverage rates in the production version of OOo 3.0.0 should be slightly higher than the figures listed in the table of the wiki page. >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_for_3.0#Coverage André Schnabel wrote: > You count 37,551 strings for UI translation. Looking at pootle, we got > only 26,832 strings for UI translation. > HC2 differs even more ~91,000 vs. ~45,000 in pootle. UI Help Total 37,551 53,406 90,957 That looks somewhat bigger difference than that of expected.
this makes your statistics looking worse than the actual status is. E.g. you report German UI translation at 74% - looking at pootle we have 98%
Good. Is it easy to obtain such statistics from the Pootle? > (where the missing 2% are for testool. Actually we have theses strings > "somewhere" but they got lost on their way to pootle). Does anyone have good explanations regarding the deficit between the number of entries in the files named localize.sdf and that of entries in the Pootle? Regards, Tora --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
