Which artefacts are we talking about? Gj
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:23 PM Jean-Marc Borer <jmbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm ok. > > Does it sound silly that I am concerned about the disappearance of the > legacy artefacts? > > What is you opinion and shall we invest any effort to save those artefacts? > > JMB > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:59 AM Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I doubt it will be live a few more years. Another year max under Oracle > > IMHO. Under Apache it won't serve those old bits from Apache infra but > > could use OSUOSL. > > > > --emi > > > > joi, 12 sept. 2019, 14:46 Jean-Marc Borer <jmbo...@gmail.com> a scris: > > > > > Sure, I understand all those points, but does anyone know how long > > > bits.netbeans.org will still be online? Last week, there was an outage > > > and, > > > of course, exactly when I was testing our new artifactory. That is why > I > > > started wondering. > > > > > > If the bits.netbeans.org will remain live during a few years, then it > is > > > not an issue we should spend time on. So does anyone know what the > plans > > > are for bits.netbeans.org? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:50 AM Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, 09:48 Eric Barboni, <sk...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > We could not move the artefacts to central because of the licence > > and > > > > the > > > > > groupid that are now for Apache NetBeans. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure this is correct. At least, I remember us getting some > > advice > > > > about pre-Apache release artefacts that might allow for this. We > should > > > at > > > > least clarify this point and not make extra work unnecessarily. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > > > > >
