I would move *everything* public facing that's on bits.netbeans.org. No need to purge anything if it's under an open-source license and OSUOSL can redistribute it.
Older builds, older Maven repositories, maybe even Javadocs? On top of my list would be NetBeans 8.2 and the 8.2 maven repo. --emi On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 5:57 PM Geertjan Wielenga <geert...@apache.org> wrote: > > Sure, let's do it, but for me the question is what precisely we want to > move to OSUOSL storage, if we can have a list or start putting one > together, we'll have a clear starting point. > > Gj > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:53 PM Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Doesn't sound silly at all. I was also very concerned about such > > matters. Now that we have the OSUOSL storage we have a place to save > > historical artifacts, it's just a matter of somebody (from the PMC, I > > guess) doing it. > > > > Besides the bits, you will find that bugzill is quite referenced in > > commits, etc and needs preserving. > > > > As is probably Geertjan's blog :-) > > > > --emi > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:23 PM Jean-Marc Borer <jmbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hmm ok. > > > > > > Does it sound silly that I am concerned about the disappearance of the > > > legacy artefacts? > > > > > > What is you opinion and shall we invest any effort to save those > > artefacts? > > > > > > JMB > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:59 AM Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I doubt it will be live a few more years. Another year max under Oracle > > > > IMHO. Under Apache it won't serve those old bits from Apache infra but > > > > could use OSUOSL. > > > > > > > > --emi > > > > > > > > joi, 12 sept. 2019, 14:46 Jean-Marc Borer <jmbo...@gmail.com> a scris: > > > > > > > > > Sure, I understand all those points, but does anyone know how long > > > > > bits.netbeans.org will still be online? Last week, there was an > > outage > > > > > and, > > > > > of course, exactly when I was testing our new artifactory. That is > > why I > > > > > started wondering. > > > > > > > > > > If the bits.netbeans.org will remain live during a few years, then > > it is > > > > > not an issue we should spend time on. So does anyone know what the > > plans > > > > > are for bits.netbeans.org? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:50 AM Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, 09:48 Eric Barboni, <sk...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could not move the artefacts to central because of the > > licence > > > > and > > > > > > the > > > > > > > groupid that are now for Apache NetBeans. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure this is correct. At least, I remember us getting some > > > > advice > > > > > > about pre-Apache release artefacts that might allow for this. We > > should > > > > > at > > > > > > least clarify this point and not make extra work unnecessarily. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
