Sure, let's do it, but for me the question is what precisely we want to
move to OSUOSL storage, if we can have a list or start putting one
together, we'll have a clear starting point.

Gj

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:53 PM Emilian Bold <[email protected]> wrote:

> Doesn't sound silly at all. I was also very concerned about such
> matters. Now that we have the OSUOSL storage we have a place to save
> historical artifacts, it's just a matter of somebody (from the PMC, I
> guess) doing it.
>
> Besides the bits, you will find that bugzill is quite referenced in
> commits, etc and needs preserving.
>
> As is probably Geertjan's blog :-)
>
> --emi
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:23 PM Jean-Marc Borer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm ok.
> >
> > Does it sound silly that I am concerned about the disappearance of the
> > legacy artefacts?
> >
> > What is you opinion and shall we invest any effort to save those
> artefacts?
> >
> > JMB
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:59 AM Emilian Bold <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I doubt it will be live a few more years. Another year max under Oracle
> > > IMHO. Under Apache it won't serve those old bits from Apache infra but
> > > could use OSUOSL.
> > >
> > > --emi
> > >
> > > joi, 12 sept. 2019, 14:46 Jean-Marc Borer <[email protected]> a scris:
> > >
> > > > Sure, I understand all those points, but does anyone know how long
> > > > bits.netbeans.org will still be online? Last week, there was an
> outage
> > > > and,
> > > > of course, exactly when I was testing our new artifactory. That is
> why I
> > > > started wondering.
> > > >
> > > > If the bits.netbeans.org will remain live during a few years, then
> it is
> > > > not an issue we should spend time on. So does anyone know what the
> plans
> > > > are for bits.netbeans.org?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:50 AM Neil C Smith <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, 09:48 Eric Barboni, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >  We could not move the artefacts to central because of the
> licence
> > > and
> > > > > the
> > > > > > groupid that are now for Apache NetBeans.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure this is correct. At least, I remember us getting some
> > > advice
> > > > > about pre-Apache release artefacts that might allow for this. We
> should
> > > > at
> > > > > least clarify this point and not make extra work unnecessarily.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best wishes,
> > > > >
> > > > > Neil
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to