I have the feeling all the confusion about the nb-javac is due to fact
 that most of the information is scattered among different discussions and
(old?) wiki pages. As it is a hot topic, it would deserve a single and
up-to-date location about the evolution, don't you think?

Best wishes,

Jean-Marc

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:24 AM Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 10:06, Jean-Marc Borer <jmbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sure it would be good to code without it, but it seems that using the
> plain
> > vanilla javac leads to some serious caveats according to
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Java+Editor+Using+JDK+javac
>
> That page is quite old now.  There are still caveats, but also Jan and
> others have done a lot of work to make things better with vanilla
> javac.
>
> If we are dropping nb-javac as mooted elsewhere in 12.1, then that
> would be a decision to be made with the current caveats in mind.
>
> There are some serious caveats to keeping nb-javac too, as Geertjan's
> thread today reveals! ;-)
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to