I have the feeling all the confusion about the nb-javac is due to fact that most of the information is scattered among different discussions and (old?) wiki pages. As it is a hot topic, it would deserve a single and up-to-date location about the evolution, don't you think?
Best wishes, Jean-Marc On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:24 AM Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 10:06, Jean-Marc Borer <jmbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sure it would be good to code without it, but it seems that using the > plain > > vanilla javac leads to some serious caveats according to > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Java+Editor+Using+JDK+javac > > That page is quite old now. There are still caveats, but also Jan and > others have done a lot of work to make things better with vanilla > javac. > > If we are dropping nb-javac as mooted elsewhere in 12.1, then that > would be a decision to be made with the current caveats in mind. > > There are some serious caveats to keeping nb-javac too, as Geertjan's > thread today reveals! ;-) > > Best wishes, > > Neil > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >