IMHO this justifies even more to group the information about
nb-javac/javac in single place, no?

JMB

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:25 PM Geertjan Wielenga <geert...@apache.org>
wrote:

> It’s changing all the time though. The enhancements that nb-javac brings
> are continually being reworked into our GitHub via interaction with vanilla
> javac.
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 12:22, Jean-Marc Borer <jmbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have the feeling all the confusion about the nb-javac is due to fact
> >  that most of the information is scattered among different discussions
> and
> > (old?) wiki pages. As it is a hot topic, it would deserve a single and
> > up-to-date location about the evolution, don't you think?
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Jean-Marc
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:24 AM Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 10:06, Jean-Marc Borer <jmbo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Sure it would be good to code without it, but it seems that using the
> > > plain
> > > > vanilla javac leads to some serious caveats according to
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Java+Editor+Using+JDK+javac
> > >
> > > That page is quite old now.  There are still caveats, but also Jan and
> > > others have done a lot of work to make things better with vanilla
> > > javac.
> > >
> > > If we are dropping nb-javac as mooted elsewhere in 12.1, then that
> > > would be a decision to be made with the current caveats in mind.
> > >
> > > There are some serious caveats to keeping nb-javac too, as Geertjan's
> > > thread today reveals! ;-)
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > >
> > > Neil
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
> > >
> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to