Ate wrote: > Hi Mark, > Thanks a ton for the detailed reply, which makes a lot of sense to me. > > Given that, I see no strong argument or reason to further hold up the (re)quest to keep using org.netbeans for Maven GroupId. > Assuming of course all the technical and administrative hurdles with Nexus and Sonatype can and will be dealt with appropriately. > So +1 on this from me.
Thank you Ate and Mark for looking at the Apache NetBeans groupId issue so through-fully. Thanks Ate, for giving us a go to proceed. Eric Barboni <sk...@apache.org> wrote: > I would like to know how to present or handle the vote for a this staged > items > I personally suggest to hold the vote few weeks to not conflict with the current vote about NetBeans 11 release, but... > The content is on apache nexus like that > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenetbeans-1012 > the build is based on source from a git tag equals to the voted Apache > NetBeans (incubating) 10 and I sign the artefacts with my key. Is this > enough for a vote ? (nothing more on dist.apache.org as source zip > already done, not sha512 as nexus not support it) > ...count with my +1 for the https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenetbeans-1012 repository anytime you call the vote! -jt
