Just to clarify, I wasn't advocating that it should be removed (I'm not really advocating for anything). My point was meant to illustrate that it's not a draw, but it is potentially an educational reference. So, it depends on how you want to use the real-estate in the tag line.
On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 11:19:38 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > We can get rid of the FBP reference. I'll just be the excited tech guy in > the corner of the conference that keeps talking about it. > On Jan 29, 2015 1:00 PM, "Joey Echeverria" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I understand that flow-based programming is very important as the model > of > > NiFi, but I don't think it's a widely understood term. FWIW, I hadn't > heard > > of it until I started working with NiFi. > > > > On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 9:56:10 AM Jennifer Barnabee < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Donald, > > > I like your tagline sentence for the most part. Thanks so much for > > sending > > > it. Maybe it can get us to where we want to be... > > > > > > I have these thoughts to add... > > > > > > a) I think we want to honor that flow-based programming is the basis of > > the > > > software. So, that's important, and I think that's why it went into the > > > tagline. But I'm not sure whether it has to be specifically there. > > Someone > > > else can weigh in on that. > > > > > > b) My only problem with your tagline is the last part: "transform and > > move > > > files". One thing is - we don't want to limit NiFi to being only > > > file-based. Secondly, moving and transforming data is not all that NiFi > > > does. In truth, NiFi is not just a dataflow system. It's a dataflow > > > management system. And that encompasses everything about the dataflow, > > from > > > how the data moves and/or gets transformed and routed, to how you > monitor > > > that, how you track down the data, how you configure and design the > > > dataflow to be better, etc. The moving and transforming parts are just > > > some of the extension points. It's the framework that allows you to > > manage > > > *whatever* you do with the data. > > > > > > So, now that I've rambled on, it's clear that I can't come up with > > > something concise. I think I may be too close to everything :-) > > > But I think you are on the right track! I would be happy to know what > > > others think. It would be great if people could land on the page and > > > quickly understand what NiFi is. So far, your sentence would get people > > > closer to that than anything I have proposed. > > > Cheers, > > > Jenn > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Donald Miner <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On the subject of taglines, a minor nitpick (sorry). I'm just a fan > of > > > > concise and meaningful taglines. > > > > > > > > "is a dataflow system based on the concepts of flow-based > programming. > > It > > > > is currently a part of the Apache Incubator." is rather wordy. > > > > > > > > "flow" and "based" are in this sentence twice, which makes it kind of > > > > awkward. Does flow-based programming really matter enough to be part > of > > > the > > > > tagline? Maybe it should just be a bullet point below. Same with > > > incubator > > > > status... I think that's readily available information that doesn't > > > > necessarily need to be in the tagline (and would eventually change). > > > > > > > > Here's my stab: > > > > > > > > "The Apache NiFi dataflow system is an easy to use, highly > > configurable, > > > > extendable, and reliable way to transform and move files." > > > > > > > > I think the list of properties in the middle of my sentence could be > > > > replaced by someone who has a better idea of what the true sticking > > > points > > > > for NiFi will be. > > > > > > > > -d > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jenn > > > > > > > > > > Apologies for the delayed feedback. > > > > > > > > > > I agree it could be more concise but feel like the proposed is too > > > > concise > > > > > to as have lost some important meaning. Many projects claim > they're > > > > > lightweight, scalable, and easy to use and almost always that just > > > isn't > > > > > true. We're arguably not 'lightweight' anymore. We could have > said > > > that > > > > > when it was a 6 MB download perhaps but now that we're weighing in > at > > > > > 100MB's we probably shouldn't claim that on its own. We're > certainly > > > > > 'lightweight' in many important aspects and arguably in all the > ways > > > that > > > > > truly matter but we should be at least somewhat specific. I agree > > > we're > > > > > scalable but again without context that feels misleading. I agree > we > > > > have > > > > > an extremely nice UI that is indeed highly configurable and > intuitive > > > but > > > > > the same thoughts apply which is we should provide some context as > to > > > > what > > > > > we mean. > > > > > > > > > > This is the nice part of this as an open source thing. We can just > > be > > > > > straight up and precise about the features and what they're good > for > > > and > > > > > what they do. We can even be self deprecating and point out what > > we're > > > > not > > > > > good at. If it were a commercial construct or we were marketing > then > > > we > > > > > might need to be less specific so as not to exclude some potential > > > > business > > > > > area. But in this case, we're a tiny little open source project > that > > > > very > > > > > few people know about. We're only going to grow by being > > > straightforward > > > > > about what it is and attracting those who buy in to that vision and > > > > > direction. > > > > > > > > > > Just thoughts here - i am not asking you to avoid changing it > should > > > you > > > > > feel really strongly that you want to change it. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Jennifer Barnabee < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Matt et al - > > > > > > The new website design is looking great... I feel like the text > > > needs > > > > to > > > > > > be simpler and more to the point. > > > > > > > > > > > > For the tagline under the first Apache nifi heading, I suggest > > making > > > > it > > > > > a > > > > > > bullet rather than including the verb "is". I'd also like to make > > the > > > > > > features into simpler bullets. See my suggested text below. I > hope > > it > > > > > still > > > > > > captures the essence of what we want to convey, but others may > have > > > > good > > > > > > suggestions as well... For example, in the last bullet, I don't > > know > > > > if > > > > > > "client" would be better than "user" or if "authentication" would > > be > > > > > better > > > > > > than "authorization". You guys probably have a better handle on > > that > > > > type > > > > > > of stuff. > > > > > > > > > > > > *Apache nifi * > > > > > > > > > > > > - A dataflow system based on the concepts of flow-based > > programming. > > > It > > > > > is > > > > > > currently a part of the Apache Incubator. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache NiFi supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of > data > > > > > routing, > > > > > > transformation, and system mediation logic. High-level features > > > > include: > > > > > > > > > > > > - Lightweight > > > > > > - Scalable > > > > > > - Highly Configurable > > > > > > - Intuitive User Interface > > > > > > - Component-based Extension Model > > > > > > - Fine Grained Data Provenance > > > > > > - Enterprise & Inter-system Security > > > > > > - Content Encryption/Decryption > > > > > > - Pluggable SSL & PKI User Authorization > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *I kinda don't like that you have to scroll down to see all the > > > > features. > > > > > > But I realize it wouldn't bother me if I was looking at it on my > > > phone, > > > > > so > > > > > > I don't know why I'm complaining about that... * > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Jenn > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Matt Gilman < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I went ahead and started implementing the website based on the > > most > > > > > > recent > > > > > > > feedback and mock ups. I've done just the main page and put it > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://nifi.incubator.apache.org/v2/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if there's a more appropriate place to host > > > that. > > > > > > > Anyways, I am going to continue working to port over the > > remaining > > > > > pages > > > > > > > and figure out a good way to integrate the documentation that > is > > > > > > generated > > > > > > > from building NiFi. Part of that is likely going to depend on > > what > > > > > > > repository the site is kept in. What I've done uses a number of > > > tools > > > > > > > (grunt, assemble, bower, etc) to actually build the site. I > > believe > > > > the > > > > > > > Apache CMS tool will be CMing the resulting site. Where do > others > > > CM > > > > > the > > > > > > > actual development artifacts of their sites? I did find another > > > > Apache > > > > > > > project with a similar set up: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and they appear to have a separate repository for there site. > > > Should > > > > I > > > > > be > > > > > > > requesting another repository for this? Or should I just add it > > to > > > > the > > > > > > > existing incubator-nifi and have a top level folder for the > site? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, I also noticed that jclouds has a deployment script which > > > > appears > > > > > > to > > > > > > > automate that process as well. Is this how most projects handle > > > site > > > > > > > updates? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Aldrin Piri < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems like a fair list of points to resolve. Let me know how > > you > > > > > want > > > > > > > > to tackle it and if you'd like me to investigate any of them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AsciiDoc provides an HTML5 backend [1] that should provide a > > hook > > > > to > > > > > > > > help it be consistent in some form with the rest of the site. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/asciidoc.css-embedded.html#X35 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Matt Gilman < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Agreed. Lets see give it a try and see how it looks. I > > thought > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > possibly just putting the drop in the toolbar but held off > > > > > initially > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > your comment about being consistently visible across all > > pages > > > is > > > > > on > > > > > > > > point. > > > > > > > > > This brings up another issue that the current documentation > > > loads > > > > > in > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > page > > > > > > > > > without the toolbar so that'll have to be addressed. > Haven't > > > > messed > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > bootstrap so I'll have to see what's possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Outstanding issues... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Better integrate documentation pages into website > > > > > > > > > - Get updated images (and properly scale them) > > > > > > > > > - Update website markup for production use (what I did was > > > quick > > > > > and > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > > for the mockup so we continue this discussion) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anything else I'm forgetting? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Aldrin Piri < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Matt, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Looks good here. I think clean and simple is the right > > > > direction > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > >> is just another step in that evolution. I think it is a > > matter > > > > of > > > > > > > > >> nit-picking at this point so the following comments come > > with > > > > that > > > > > > > > scope of > > > > > > > > >> importance. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> I would like to see the logo make it somewhere on the page > > > > > > > consistently > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > >> the sake of keeping it across all pages in the site. I > > > realize > > > > > the > > > > > > > > logo in > > > > > > > > >> the navbar is rather redundant for the home page, but on > all > > > the > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > >> pages such as documentation and general project > information, > > > > there > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > >> no presence in the current state. One way to compromise > > might > > > > be > > > > > to > > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > >> use of the commonplace technique where the logo on the > main > > > > > content > > > > > > > area > > > > > > > > >> gets placed into the navbar when scrolling would obscure > the > > > > logo; > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > >> other pages would then just have it in the header. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Maybe a slightly heavier weight on the navbar for the menu > > > > items. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 22:51 Matt Gilman < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Aldrin, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > I like what you did here and it sounds like most people > do > > > > too. > > > > > I > > > > > > > > wanted > > > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > > > >> > provide some feedback and minor suggestions but thought > it > > > > would > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > >> > easier to mock it up myself rather than trying to ask > you > > to > > > > > move > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > >> here > > > > > > > > >> > and that there. Anyways, take a peek and lets continue > > > > > iterating. > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > >> > we're on the right track. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > https://raw.githubusercontent. > > > com/mcgilman/apache-nifi-site/ > > > > > > > > >> > screenshots/index.html.lite.v1.2.png > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Matt > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Joe Witt < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Dan, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > No real thought behind it. But I personally agree > with > > > your > > > > > > > > statement: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > the logos look good as "nifi" and the text looks good > as > > > > > "NiFi" > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Thanks > > > > > > > > >> > > Joe > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Bress < > > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Aldrin, > > > > > > > > >> > > > I think this looks good. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > All, > > > > > > > > >> > > > Maybe this is a little off topic, but I noticed > > that > > > > the > > > > > > > logos > > > > > > > > >> > > > consistently use "nifi" whereas in text its > > consistently > > > > > > written > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > >> > > > "NiFi". Any reason for the difference? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I kind of thing the logos look good as "nifi" and > > the > > > > > text > > > > > > > > looks > > > > > > > > >> > good > > > > > > > > >> > > > as "NiFi" so I might be questioning something that I > > am > > > OK > > > > > > with. > > > > > > > > >> But I > > > > > > > > >> > > > noticed they are different and was wondering if this > > > was a > > > > > > > > conscious > > > > > > > > >> > > > decision or not. Thoughts? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Dan Bress > > > > > > > > >> > > > Software Engineer > > > > > > > > >> > > > ONYX Consulting Services > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > ________________________________________ > > > > > > > > >> > > > From: Joe Witt <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 6:40 PM > > > > > > > > >> > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> > > > Subject: Re: Website Theme > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Solid design and agree with all your comments > aldrin. > > > > Very > > > > > > > nice > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Jan 20, 2015 6:27 PM, "Aldrin Piri" < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Mark, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks for the comments. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I actuality tried it without the logo on the main > > page > > > > and > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > felt > > > > > > > > >> a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > bit empty. I don't know that we necessarily need > > the > > > > logo > > > > > > > > there, > > > > > > > > >> but > > > > > > > > >> > > > > something is needed. Additionally, I viewed it as > > > being > > > > > > just > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > >> > "front > > > > > > > > >> > > > > page" inclusion, as other pages would just have > the > > > top > > > > > > > navbar. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > You caught me. I was lazy and I recycled the > > > screenshot > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > first iteration. It would definitely need > updating, > > > but > > > > > is > > > > > > > > largely > > > > > > > > >> > > > > just a placeholder for the concept. I would > > > definitely > > > > > like > > > > > > > > >> > something > > > > > > > > >> > > > > a bit more engaging. (faux edit) I rearranged > > things > > > a > > > > > bit, > > > > > > > > >> removing > > > > > > > > >> > > > > the second instance of the logo and placing more > > > > emphasis > > > > > on > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> one > > > > > > > > >> > > > > in the corner of the application. Not sure if I > > like > > > it > > > > > > > better, > > > > > > > > >> but > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I've provided the results [1] with all three of > the > > > > > > > submissions > > > > > > > > >> shown > > > > > > > > >> > > > > in chronological order [2]. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > The news section is a toss-up for me at this > > juncture. > > > > I > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > >> > > > > the need one for eventually, but I'm not sure if > the > > > > > project > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > >> quite > > > > > > > > >> > > > > there yet. It seemed a common thread among > > incubating > > > > > sites > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > >> > such > > > > > > > > >> > > > > a section was omitted whereas those top-level > > projects > > > > > > > typically > > > > > > > > >> > > > > included one. Given that the project is on the > > verge > > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > > > first > > > > > > > > >> of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > the regular releases, perhaps this is increasingly > > > > > pertinent > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > near future. At minimum, one of the screen grabs > > from > > > > > your > > > > > > > blog > > > > > > > > >> > posts > > > > > > > > >> > > > > would be a good candidate. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/scr > > > > > > > > >> > eenshots/index.html.lite.v1.1.png > > > > > > > > >> > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/blob/screenshots/README.md > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Mark Payne < > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Aldrin, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm liking it! Definitely looks nice. Though I > > would > > > > > > > provide a > > > > > > > > >> bit > > > > > > > > >> > of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > feedback: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm not sure that I would include the NiFi logo > on > > > the > > > > > > > > right-hand > > > > > > > > >> > > side, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > since it's already in the top-left. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > From a NiFi 'brand' perspective, I would update > > the > > > > > > > > screenshot a > > > > > > > > >> > bit. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > This screenshot is using the old logo in the > > top-left > > > > > > corner, > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > >> > > > graph > > > > > > > > >> > > > > shows all of the data disappearing before the > > > > > > RouteOnAttribute > > > > > > > > >> > > Processor. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I'd recommend we construct a dataflow that's more > > > > > appealing > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > target > > > > > > > > >> > > > > audience, perhaps integrating with other Apache > > > projects > > > > > > > (HDFS, > > > > > > > > >> Kafka > > > > > > > > >> > > are > > > > > > > > >> > > > > possible, for instance) or using (S)FTP processor. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Does it make sense to have maybe like a 'Latest > > > News' > > > > > > > section > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > >> > > > > something where we could post things like "Version > > > 0.0.1 > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > >> > > released!" > > > > > > > > >> > > > > etc.? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm really liking the concept - nice job! > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks-Mark > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:00:52 -0800 > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> Subject: Re: Website Theme > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> From: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> I like it. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Aldrin Piri < > > > > > > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > I found some time today to provide another > look > > > for > > > > > the > > > > > > > > site. > > > > > > > > >> > > There > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > were very minor changes to the core HTML as > is > > > > > > currently > > > > > > > > >> served > > > > > > > > >> > at > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > nidi homepage and it is largely just a > > > stylesheet. > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > >> is > > > > > > > > >> > > > highly > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > minimal and clean, still driven by Bootstrap > > and > > > > > > directly > > > > > > > > >> makes > > > > > > > > >> > > use > > > > > > > > >> > > > of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > the colors from the UI itself. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > A screenshot can be seen at > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/scr > > > > > > > > >> > eenshots/index.html.lite.png > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > with the associated code under the "lite" > > branch > > > at > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/tree/lite > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > Any thoughts are appreciated. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Aldrin Piri < > > > > > > > > >> > [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Sorry if this somehow gets sent twice. My > > > first > > > > > > > > submission > > > > > > > > >> > > > seemed > > > > > > > > >> > > > > to > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > bounce as it exceeded the spam threshold > > when I > > > > > sent > > > > > > > it a > > > > > > > > >> > couple > > > > > > > > >> > > > of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > hours ago and it has yet to appear, so I'm > > > > sending > > > > > > > again. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > First and foremost, good feedback. I think > > > UI/UX > > > > > > stuff > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > >> > > tricky > > > > > > > > >> > > > > and > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > I am happy to find my livelihood in the > > > plumbing > > > > > and > > > > > > > > behind > > > > > > > > >> > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > scenes > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > work. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Here's my attempt to try and tackle all the > > > > > comments > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > >> > fell > > > > > > > > >> > > > > swoop: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > I agree that Bootstrap is everywhere, but I > > > don't > > > > > > > > >> necessarily > > > > > > > > >> > > > think > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > that is a bad thing. One could argue that > > > > > interfaces > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > >> > > forms > > > > > > > > >> > > > > are > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > converging and users have the instant > > > familiarity > > > > > of > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > known > > > > > > > > >> > > > > quantity. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > I know that I am totally unaware of what it > > > takes > > > > > to > > > > > > > > make a > > > > > > > > >> > site > > > > > > > > >> > > > > both > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > functional and maintain its feel across > > > > devices. I > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > >> that > > > > > > > > >> > > > last > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > part is important. Personally, as a user > on > > > the > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > side > > > > > > > > >> of > > > > > > > > >> > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > screen, I don't really understand why sites > > do > > > > not > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > >> > jive > > > > > > > > >> > > > with > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > my mobile device du jour these days; it > > should > > > > just > > > > > > > work. > > > > > > > > >> > With > > > > > > > > >> > > > what > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > little I've learned about UX and "Not > Making > > > > > [Anyone] > > > > > > > > >> > > Think,"[1] I > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > want an effortless experience; no pinch > > > zooming, > > > > > tap > > > > > > > > >> panning, > > > > > > > > >> > > etc. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > If > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > there is a way to take bits and pieces of > > > > bootstrap > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > >> > end > > > > > > > > >> > > to > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > support that aspect without the cookie > cutter > > > > air, > > > > > I > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > >> be > > > > > > > > >> > > > quite > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > thankful for some guidance on that front > and > > do > > > > my > > > > > > best > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > >> > > provide > > > > > > > > >> > > > > it. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Out of the box though, the sample looked > > pretty > > > > > > decent > > > > > > > > >> across > > > > > > > > >> > > all > > > > > > > > >> > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > devices to which I had access, and used > > > > constructs > > > > > > > > everyone > > > > > > > > >> > who > > > > > > > > >> > > > > views > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > content through a tiny screen is > accustomed. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > I do agree on the front of the possibility > of > > > > brand > > > > > > > > >> dilution, > > > > > > > > >> > > and > > > > > > > > >> > > > I > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > think it is an excellent point for > > > consideration. > > > > > As > > > > > > > > >> > mentioned > > > > > > > > >> > > in > > > > > > > > >> > > > > my > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > original mailing, consideration was given > to > > > > > > > integrating > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > application's aesthetics into the core > site. > > > Not > > > > > > sure > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > >> this > > > > > > > > >> > > > will > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > pan out in an appreciable way as I can see > it > > > in > > > > my > > > > > > > mind, > > > > > > > > >> but > > > > > > > > >> > I > > > > > > > > >> > > do > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > feel it is an avenue worth exploring. It > may > > > > also > > > > > > > > >> completely > > > > > > > > >> > > miss > > > > > > > > >> > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > mark, but with my new found web dev > prowess, > > it > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > be a > > > > > > > > >> > much > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > quicker iteration than the first draft. > > You'll > > > > > see a > > > > > > > > slight > > > > > > > > >> > > > homage > > > > > > > > >> > > > > to > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > this via the graph wallpaper that is > featured > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > application > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > itself. This was muted a bit by a CSS > > overlay > > > > to a > > > > > > > level > > > > > > > > >> that > > > > > > > > >> > > > > seemed > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > okay, but I definitely hedged as to whether > > or > > > > not > > > > > to > > > > > > > > >> include > > > > > > > > >> > > it. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Ultimately, I wanted to get something out > to > > > > start > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > ball > > > > > > > > >> > > > rolling, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > establishing a base for successive > > > iterations. I > > > > > > know > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > >> > with > > > > > > > > >> > > > all > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > the hard work everyone is putting in, the > > > project > > > > > is > > > > > > > > closely > > > > > > > > >> > > > > reaching > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > its first milestone for release, and > thought > > it > > > > > > > > important to > > > > > > > > >> > > chip > > > > > > > > >> > > > in > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > where possible to give a face to the > project. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Additionally, I think this particular > project > > > > needs > > > > > > > > pictures > > > > > > > > >> > to > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > demonstrate what it's capabilities. One of > > the > > > > > > facets > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > >> > > makes > > > > > > > > >> > > > > me a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > believer about NiFi as a whole is that the > > end > > > > user > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > >> > just > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > developers. Citing the previous example of > > > > > Accumulo, > > > > > > > its > > > > > > > > >> > > intended > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > audience is very technical in nature and, > > > > > > accordingly, > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > >> > can > > > > > > > > >> > > > be > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > expressed via the simple phrase of > "key-value > > > > > store." > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > >> would > > > > > > > > >> > > > > contend > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > that NiFi's reach is far broader and can't > be > > > > done > > > > > > > > justice > > > > > > > > >> > with > > > > > > > > >> > > a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > simple phrase. For the casual potential > user > > > who > > > > > has > > > > > > > > strung > > > > > > > > >> > > > > together > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > n-many processes of taking a file, manually > > > > > > > transforming > > > > > > > > it, > > > > > > > > >> > and > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > moving it elsewhere, they need to see at > > quick > > > > > glance > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > >> > there > > > > > > > > >> > > > is > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > something that can automate this tedium and > > > make > > > > > them > > > > > > > > more > > > > > > > > >> > > > > effective. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Succinctly, the value proposition needs to > be > > > > there > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > only > > > > > > > > >> > for > > > > > > > > >> > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > technical folks who will use this as a > > > framework, > > > > > but > > > > > > > > >> > > additionally > > > > > > > > >> > > > > for > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > end users. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > The background for the header isn't > awesome, > > > but > > > > I > > > > > > > knew I > > > > > > > > >> > wasn't > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > violating any licenses if I generated it > > > > myself. I > > > > > > > > viewed > > > > > > > > >> it > > > > > > > > >> > > more > > > > > > > > >> > > > > as > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > a placeholder than anything else. > Definitely > > > > not a > > > > > > > front > > > > > > > > >> end > > > > > > > > >> > > web > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > developer, even more definitively not a > > graphic > > > > > > artist. > > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > >> > > > colors > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > came from starting with the logo dark blue > > and > > > > > > running > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > >> whole > > > > > > > > >> > > > bunch > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > of filters and plugins via GIMP to get > > > something. > > > > > > > > >> > Additionally, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > there > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > is a CSS gradient applied over top of it as > > > well > > > > > when > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > >> > seemed > > > > > > > > >> > > a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > bit > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > too loud. It could definitely deal with > > being > > > > > muted > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > bit > > > > > > > > >> > more. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > [1] http://www.sensible.com/dmmt.html > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Tony Kurc > < > > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> Hey! It looks awesome! The existing site > was > > > put > > > > > > > > together a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > placeholder > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > and > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> we went with a very generic layout that > > worked > > > > > well > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > >> > Apache > > > > > > > > >> > > > > CMS and > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> contained all the information expected of > an > > > > > apache > > > > > > > > >> process. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> This is a big improvement! For people new > to > > > the > > > > > > > > project, > > > > > > > > >> it > > > > > > > > >> > > > gives > > > > > > > > >> > > > > a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > nice > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> upfront screenshot, with big fat links for > > > > things > > > > > I > > > > > > > care > > > > > > > > >> > about > > > > > > > > >> > > > > people > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> seeing! > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> Some things I didn't like about the > existing > > > > site > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > glyphicon > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > links > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> to "external" sites on the menu. I used > > > "link", > > > > > but > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > >> > it > > > > > > > > >> > > > was > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > meant to > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> be used for "permalink". Also, we kind of > > > took a > > > > > > best > > > > > > > > guess > > > > > > > > >> > > about > > > > > > > > >> > > > > what > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> should go in each dropdown in the menu. > I'm > > > > pretty > > > > > > > sure > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > >> > > could > > > > > > > > >> > > > be > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > better > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> organized. I'd also like to see the > awesome > > > > guides > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > >> > people > > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > have a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> consistent theme with the website and > maybe > > > have > > > > > > pdfs > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > >> > > > old-school > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > folks > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> can print them out (which may be a dumb > idea > > > ;) > > > > ) > > > > > A > > > > > > > pet > > > > > > > > >> peeve > > > > > > > > >> > > of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > mine of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> projects is having a hard time finding the > > > > > > > > documentation I > > > > > > > > >> > > need, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > like > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> javadocs or specifications - and keeping > > > around > > > > > the > > > > > > > > older > > > > > > > > >> > > > versions > > > > > > > > >> > > > > of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> documentation. I think we're still working > > on > > > > > these > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > since > > > > > > > > >> > you > > > > > > > > >> > > > > retained > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> the menu up top it should be > straightforward > > > to > > > > > > have a > > > > > > > > >> robust > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > documentation > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> dropdown. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> The blue you used is more of a reddish or > > > > purplish > > > > > > > blue > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > >> > > > blue > > > > > > > > >> > > > > used > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > in > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> the app is more of a greenish blue. I'm > kind > > > of > > > > > > > curious > > > > > > > > >> what > > > > > > > > >> > a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > greener > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > blue > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> would look like ... did you mock one up > and > > it > > > > > > looked > > > > > > > > bad? > > > > > > > > >> Or > > > > > > > > >> > > > > maybe a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > more > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> fundamental question, should the website > > evoke > > > > the > > > > > > > > theme of > > > > > > > > >> > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > app? I > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> don't know how I feel. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> Tony > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Joe Witt > < > > > > > > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> I'd say the two sides of the spectrum as > > > > examples > > > > > > > are: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> http://kafka.apache.org/ [super > > minimalist] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> http://aurora.incubator.apache.org/ [ > > quite > > > > > fancy > > > > > > > > >> looking ] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> Both in my opinion are beautifully done > and > > > > make > > > > > it > > > > > > > > easy > > > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > > > >> > > get > > > > > > > > >> > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > content > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> needed. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> I think these (and others) provide great > > > > examples > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > >> both > > > > > > > > >> > > > sides > > > > > > > > >> > > > > of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> spectrum have merit. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> What is most important to me is that we > as > > a > > > > > > > community > > > > > > > > >> rally > > > > > > > > >> > > > > behind > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > those > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> with the expertise and willingness to > > > > contribute > > > > > in > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > >> > > space. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> Thanks > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> Joe > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Joe > Witt < > > > > > > > > >> > [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > Both are bootstrap based. Each is an > > > > iterative > > > > > > > > >> > improvement. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > And we > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > just > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > keep iterating as folks have time, > > > > willingness, > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > >> > > expertise > > > > > > > > >> > > > > to do > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > so. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > I agree that this new look does not > > > > > distinguish a > > > > > > > > brand. > > > > > > > > >> > > But > > > > > > > > >> > > > > we're > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > not > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > mature enough to worry about that yet. > > We > > > > just > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > >> > enough > > > > > > > > >> > > of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > right > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > info laid out enough to help grow a > > > community > > > > > and > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > >> > folks > > > > > > > > >> > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > info > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > they > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > need. We need it laid out in a way > that > > > > > multiple > > > > > > > > folks > > > > > > > > >> > can > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > contribute. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > Once we have a release, recruit some > > > > > committers, > > > > > > > > >> > demonstrate > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > progress on > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > the Apache Way and grow then perhaps > > > branding > > > > > > > > becomes a > > > > > > > > >> > > bigger > > > > > > > > >> > > > > deal. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > ..this motivates me to spawn another > > thread > > > > > about > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> type > > > > > > > > >> > > of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > community > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> we > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > want to be... > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > Thanks > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > Joe > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Adam > > Taft > > > < > > > > > > > > >> > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> This isn't a downvote -- I think it > > indeed > > > > > looks > > > > > > > > good. > > > > > > > > >> > But > > > > > > > > >> > > > in > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > terms of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> constructive criticism... > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> I think the mockup looks like a very > > > generic > > > > > > > > >> "bootstrap" > > > > > > > > >> > > > site, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > similar > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> to > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> million other bootstrap based sites. > > I'd > > > > > > > personally > > > > > > > > >> > almost > > > > > > > > >> > > > > prefer > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> existing utilitarian website over a > > > > bootstrap > > > > > > > theme, > > > > > > > > >> > simply > > > > > > > > >> > > > > because > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > it > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> doesn't try to be anything more than > > what > > > it > > > > > is. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> This approach might be an acceptable > > > > tradeoff > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > project; > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > having > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> bootstrap look & feel is obviously a > > > > resource > > > > > > > > savings > > > > > > > > >> and > > > > > > > > >> > > > > available > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > at > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> right price point. But the site > mockup > > > > > > definitely > > > > > > > > >> > doesn't > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > distinguish > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> Apache NiFi "brand" in anyway. In fact > > the > > > > > > > opposite, > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > >> > > > brand > > > > > > > > >> > > > > gets > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> watered > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> down with this look. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> As a funny side note, humorously for > me, > > > > this > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > first > > > > > > > > >> > > > > thought > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > in > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> my > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> head when I saw the site: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2010-04-01/ > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> Adam > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Aldrin > > > Piri > > > > < > > > > > > > > >> > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > In partial fulfillment of the goals > of > > > > > > > NIFI-162, I > > > > > > > > >> set > > > > > > > > >> > > some > > > > > > > > >> > > > > time > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > aside > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> to > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > put together something a bit more > > > visually > > > > > > > > appealing > > > > > > > > >> > as a > > > > > > > > >> > > > > face > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > for the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > project. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > My work can be found at: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > https://github.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > Currently, work focused around the > > > > homepage, > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > >> > similar > > > > > > > > >> > > > > styles > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > would > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> be > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > applied to more content driven pages > > > minus > > > > > the > > > > > > > > large > > > > > > > > >> > > > > headlining > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> sections. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > The relevant technology colophon is > > > > provided > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > README > > > > > > > > >> > > > on > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > Github > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> but is > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > primarily driven by Bootstrap, > > existing > > > > > image > > > > > > > > >> resources > > > > > > > > >> > > > > included > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > with > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > project and current site, and other > > > > > "artwork" > > > > > > > > which I > > > > > > > > >> > > > created > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > myself. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > I am neither a UX expert nor am I a > > > > renowned > > > > > > > front > > > > > > > > >> end > > > > > > > > >> > > > > designer, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > so > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> all > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > input is welcome. As a "version > 1.1" > > I > > > > > would > > > > > > > > like to > > > > > > > > >> > > > adjust > > > > > > > > >> > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > site > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> to > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > converge more with the application. > > > Ideas > > > > > for > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > >> are > > > > > > > > >> > > > > inclusive > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > of > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> points > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > such as bringing the toolbar styling > > and > > > > > color > > > > > > > > scheme > > > > > > > > >> > > from > > > > > > > > >> > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> application > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > to the site. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > If this seems like a reasonable path > > > > forward > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > >> there > > > > > > > > >> > is > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > sufficient > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > support, I can look at the next > steps > > to > > > > get > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > >> > > > integrated > > > > > > > > >> > > > > with > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > project, optimization, and > integration > > > > with > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > application > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > itself. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > To aid in showing the intangibles > that > > > > can't > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > seen > > > > > > > > >> > from > > > > > > > > >> > > > an > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > image, I > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> have > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > a copy of this design hosted at > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > http://aldrinpiri.com/apache-nifi/. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> The > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > links are currently nonfunctional as > > > they > > > > > were > > > > > > > > taken > > > > > > > > >> > from > > > > > > > > >> > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > current > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> site. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > Thanks! > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > --Aldrin > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
