CWIKI mayn't be a good place since it requires that the user has an Apache account at least to make any change as far as I know. It's better to be tracked by a github issue.
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 9:27 AM Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:44 PM Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 5/22/23, Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 1:55 AM Alan C. Assis wrote: > > >> I think it is better to keep the documentation in a single place: > > >> https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/contributing/index.html > > >> We're moving those documentations from confluence to our internal > > >> repository. > > >> So, that could be nice if you could send patches to Documentation/ > > >> directory directly. > > > > > > Yup, cwiki at this moment is a kind of scratchpad, all documentation > > > is being transferred to git / documentation.. but we may still use > > > cwiki to keep project administrative information like notes, rfc, > > > etc..? > > > > > > > No, I don't think so. Please search in the mailing list about this > > moving docs discussion. > > > > Docs should move to repo, yes, BUT if I understand correctly Tomek is > talking about things like ongoing discussions, debates within the > community, such as arguments for and against adopting CMake. That is not > documentation for users of NuttX. That is a place for the community to > collect all the arguments in a debate so they will be easy to reference in > one place and easy to see if there are more pros than cons, or more cons > than pros. That should be able to go in the CWIKI and not docs in the repo, > IMHO. > > Cheers > Nathan >
