Re: well so much for backward compatibility. (RANT)

[David E Jones]

-David


On Nov 19, 2007, at 12:45 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:

Could you be more specific, ie what is broken and what errors are you getting?

I just plugged my code from ver 4.0 into trunk
guess what
none of it works.
so what happend to depreciating then removing, based on releases.
Sure ver 1.5 has lots of neat things.

can.

but shouldn't we try to conserve as much of the programming effort as we Why not add the same functions and method and leave the 1.4 compatibility

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature