Hi Jacques,

The developer can refer to the proposed ofbiz.version property if needed.

Regards,
James Yong

On 2017-11-28 00:03, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Hi James,
> 
> That's good when you start but could be hard to find after many days running 
> in production for instance
> 
> Jacques
> 
> 
> Le 27/11/2017 à 15:43, James Yong a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > How about hardcoding the released version in start.properties?
> > E.g.
> > ofbiz.version=v16.11.03
> >
> > During startup, we can print out the version as part of the startup message 
> > like:
> >     ____  __________  _
> >    / __ \/ ____/ __ )(_)___
> >   / / / / /_  / __  / /_  /
> > / /_/ / __/ / /_/ / / / /_
> > \____/_/   /_____/_/ /___/  v16.11.03 is started and ready.
> >
> > Just update the released version in the properties before a release.
> >
> > Regards,
> > James Yong
> >
> >
> > On 2017-11-27 22:08, Akash Jain <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> +1, version information should available somewhere, it will be helpful.
> >>
> >> Thanks and Regards
> >> --
> >> Akash Jain
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Sharan Foga <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> Having the version info available somehow could be useful. Whenever a user
> >>> reports a problem on our user lists, one of the first questions we ask 
> >>> them
> >>> is "What version are you using?"
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps asking the question about version information, on the user list
> >>> might help.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Sharan
> >>>
> >>> On 2017-11-27 08:49, Pierre Smits <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Devanshu Vyas,
> >>>>
> >>>> Please see inline.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Pierre Smits
> >>>>
> >>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> >>>> OFBiz based solutions & services
> >>>>
> >>>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1
> >>>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> >>>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Devanshu Vyas <
> >>> [email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thank you all for your thoughts on this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I really like the idea shared by Taher to create a version file using
> >>>>> target and after second thought I agree that it can be a tiresome task
> >>> to
> >>>>> update version info manually with each release.
> >>>>> But before we conclude this discussion, I would like to share another
> >>>>> thought with you. I think we can add OFBiz version info in the
> >>> licensing
> >>>>> information we add to our files.
> >>>>> I know it will be a manual task, but can be easily done with a simple
> >>> Find
> >>>>> & Replace.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am happy to work on the whichever implementation we decide
> >>> here(hoping I
> >>>>> am not stepping on anyone's toes).
> >>>>>
> >>>> Don't worry. I bet you aren't. ;)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> And my reason to raise the concern was that it is very difficult to
> >>>>> identify which version of code a user is using(a real-time scenario
> >>> where I
> >>>>> was exposed to OFBiz code and I couldn't perform anything on it. So
> >>> just by
> >>>>> looking at it, I was unable to determine what version it was)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> So you experienced a user being exposed to a OOTB OFBiz deployment,
> >>>> deployed by your employer HotWax? Or was the user exposed to a deployment
> >>>> that was also modified? In either case this is an issue related to the
> >>>> Release Management process applied. And not necessarily an OFBIZ problem.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Waiting for your replies!!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks & Regards,
> >>>>> Devanshu Vyas.
> >>>>>
> 
> 

Reply via email to