Hi Jinghai,
Actually you had a point speaking about auth0, in relation to the JWT secret key. I forgot that in OFBIZ-9833 at "20/Feb/18 18:02" I considered
https://github.com/auth0/java-jwt#using-a-keyprovider because using a KeyProvider it's an alternative solution to using a static secret key. But
actually that's not part of my work but Deepak's at OFBIZ-9833. I now rely on OFBIZ-9833 for OFBIZ-10307.
Jacques
Le 19/08/2018 à 12:33, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Jinghai,
Actually I did not pick auth0 (not to be confused with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OAuth) nor https://oauth.net/2/ because those need a central
Identify server (as is the SAML protocol).
I simply send a JWT token: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON_Web_Token and
https://jwt.io/ to
Please refer to OFBIZ-10307 "Navigate from a domain to another with automated signed
in authentication"
Thanks for your interest.
Jacques
Le 17/08/2018 à 09:02, Shi Jinghai a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
OK, I think the redis topic is jumped to next step.
I have read the patches carelly, as a fan of Apereo CAS[1], I wonder why choose
auth0[2] rather than CAS. And is the implement OAuth2 alliance?
[1] https://github.com/apereo/cas
[2] https://auth0.com/
Kind Regards,
Shi Jinghai
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com]
发送时间: 2018年8月16日 2:08
收件人: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
主题: Re: OFBIZ-10307: Navigate from a domain to another with automated signed in
authentication
Hi Jinghai,
The problem with the token master secret key is to guarantee its secrecy at max.
We already discussed different solutions at https://s.apache.org/7yyR and
https://s.apache.org/IBDM
How is Redis more secure than Postgres for storing values?
Thanks
Jacques
Le 15/08/2018 à 14:37, Shi Jinghai a écrit :
Dear Jacques,
On how to store the Tokens, as a token is a key, value is the UserLogin entity and/or other info, a key-value db, Redis[1] is a good choice. Redis
is no.7 in db ranking in Aug 2018[2], becomes more and more popular. Goldman Sachs invested Redis team in last year[3]. It's common view now in
China that Redis is better than any others including Gemfire of Pivotal, the railway ticket system of China replaced its 3 Gemfire clusters with 3
Redis clusters last year and then there are much less complains on how difficulties to buy spring festival tickets.
Mr. Dai Haipeng contributed a Redis component in Jira[4].
[1] https://redis.io/
[2] https://db-engines.com/en/ranking
[3]
https://redislabs.com/press/redis-labs-secures-44-million-funding-led-goldman-sachs-private-capital-investing-strengthen-database-leadership/
[4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9829
BTW, I'll try to review the patches.
Kind Regards,
Shi Jinghai
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com]
发送时间: 2018年8月15日 15:09
收件人: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
主题: OFBIZ-10307: Navigate from a domain to another with automated signed in
authentication
Hi,
Some time ago I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10307.
I asked for reviews but only Taher answered and he asked to know the goal of
this new feature.
It was actually developed for a client who needed to get from one OFBiz
instance on a server (on a domain) to another OFBiz instance on another
server (on another domain) without having to sign up between the 2 while
keeping things secure.
There could be many reasons why you want to split OFBiz application on servers.
In their case it was for performance issues.
The technology used is as secure as possible. Like OAuth 2.0 it uses a token
but it does not need a middle authorization server (think to two-factor
authentication) because it's only for OFBiz instances of the same version.
To commit this work we need 1st to agree an commit the work done by Deepak at OFBIZ-9833
"Token Based Authentication" that I use in my last patch.
For me there is only one question outstanding: how to store the Token secret.
But this should not prevent us to commit Deepak's work.
It's now a long time (9 months) since I started this work. And my last patch is
ready for a month.
I crossed several issues which are now all resolved. So please review and
answer to this thread.
Without negative comments well argumented I'll commit both OFBIZ-9833 and
OFBIZ-10307 in a week. You can always test and review later, we use RTC.
Also a veto on a commit is always possible... Of course, as ever, a good
consensus is preferred.
Let me know if you need more information about the goal. For the technical
details I think I already provided them the in OFBIZ-10307.
Jacques