Jacques, I think keeping Shark will let the users upgrade from some old version safely and easily. Besides, workflow is a key point for some users to consider OFBiz.
On the LDAP component with SSO, I think it'll be better to wait more feedbacks on it especially the author(s) of check509CertLogin and checkRequestHeaderLogin. When I saw these code, I think they must have been required by some commercial SSO environments, such as IBM Tivolli Access Manager? Regards, Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd. 在 2008-09-07日的 06:09 +0200，Jacques Le Roux写道： > From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Sep 6, 2008, at 9:51 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > >> From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> No, do not remove the shark component. That isn't a commit-then- > >>> review sort of thing, and in fact I'd say we should have a vote in > >>> order to decide to remove it or not. > >> > >> OK, I personnlly don't need a vote. If you think we should keep it, > >> it's fine with me. > > > > The point is the neither you nor I are the OFBiz community, and others > > in the community may be using or may want to use it in the future and > > have plans for it even if thy don't have the luxury of the time > > necessary to act on them right now. > > > > In other words, what one person thinks only matters a little bit > > because there are many other people involved. > > Yes, but nobody but you replied so if we don't remove Shark I think it's ok. > About LDAP ? > > Jacques > > > -David > >
