From: "Shi Yusen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jacques,
I think keeping Shark will let the users upgrade from some old version
safely and easily. Besides, workflow is a key point for some users to
consider OFBiz.
Yes sure.
On the LDAP component with SSO, I think it'll be better to wait more
feedbacks on it especially the author(s) of check509CertLogin and
checkRequestHeaderLogin. When I saw these code, I think they must have
been required by some commercial SSO environments, such as IBM Tivolli
Access Manager?
OK, I will take it easy and will install in specialpurpose as you suggested
Thanks
Jacques
Regards,
Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd.
在 2008-09-07日的 06:09 +0200，Jacques Le Roux写道：
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sep 6, 2008, at 9:51 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> No, do not remove the shark component. That isn't a commit-then-
>>> review sort of thing, and in fact I'd say we should have a vote in
>>> order to decide to remove it or not.
>>
>> OK, I personnlly don't need a vote. If you think we should keep it,
>> it's fine with me.
>
> The point is the neither you nor I are the OFBiz community, and others
> in the community may be using or may want to use it in the future and
> have plans for it even if thy don't have the luxury of the time
> necessary to act on them right now.
>
> In other words, what one person thinks only matters a little bit
> because there are many other people involved.
Yes, but nobody but you replied so if we don't remove Shark I think it's ok.
About LDAP ?
Jacques
> -David
>
