What I have in mind with UEL is different. The plan is to be able to
write a permissions expression that can replace many lines of
mini-language code.
Btw, I decided to use UEL functions instead of extending the syntax.
-Adrian
Andrew Zeneski wrote:
Not really, I just implemented what we were talking about offline, its
called findMatchingPermissions(). So, now you can check
"(read|update|delete):party:10000" and it will return you a map
containing :
read:party:10000 = (true|false)
update:party:10000 = (true|false)
delete:party:10000 = (true|false)
This will only work for the base permissions (access, create, read,
update, delete) but it should be helpful.
On Apr 30, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I'm even hesitant about making this permission extension. I would
rather see the security component handle permission expressions, but
that would require a lot of coding.
