I have been testing the project manager module, and maybe there should be a connection to content-management, or something else. Before a project starts there is a set of requirements and suggestions.
A sub-project has a start and an end, where purpose is to make some deliveries. The deliveries are described in the requirements. These requirements are an attachment to an agreement with the klient. When a project has been decided the requirements are frozen, and a Bill Of Material can be created for a sub-projet. The Bill Of Materials will describe what the sub-project will deliver, and the tasks in the project-plan describes how, who and when to deliver each item in the Bill Of Materials. Torstein -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:[email protected]] Sendt: 17. juni 2009 02:00 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: ASF Board Report for 2009-06 I think it's a bit harder for the wiki part (we hage a project manager but no wiki), thus need for requirements collection and design thereafter Anyway, David already sent his links... Jacques From: "Ean Schuessler" <[email protected]> >I think the most reasonable first step would be for us to build > importers that mirror the state of JIRA into OFBiz project management. > All user accounts should be modeled as Party with the proper > corresponding roles. Once we see that we can get to a parallel level of > functionality we could then transition OFBiz development onto our own > infrastructure. Achieving this result should speak more firmly about our > intent than any spoken claim and will convince other Apache projects > that we have the capability to execute on the plan. > > Hans Bakker wrote: >> In general these subjects were handled by Tim, perhaps better he reacts >> on that? >> >> i was referring to the last report about Infrastructure, shouldn't we >> mention that we are now using contegix resources and are waiting for the >> infrateam to respond? >> >> Then there was also a request to use ofbiz for the apache >> administration/content management, shouldn't we say we are ready for >> that and are interested to make ofbiz suitable for that? >> > >
