I don't have access to the space. :-( Torstein
-----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com] Sendt: 19. juni 2009 10:44 Til: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Emne: Re: ASF Board Report for 2009-06 I think you could create a story there http://docs.ofbiz.org/pages/listpages-dirview.action?key=OFBREQDES But I'm not sure if you have access to this space. Then adding a comment at the right place would be taken into account Thanks Jacques From: "Torstein Hegbom" <torst...@itpolaris.no> >I have been testing the project manager module, and maybe there should be a > connection to content-management, or something else. Before a project starts > there is a set of requirements and suggestions. > > A sub-project has a start and an end, where purpose is to make some > deliveries. The deliveries are described in the requirements. These > requirements are an attachment to an agreement with the klient. > > When a project has been decided the requirements are frozen, and a Bill Of > Material can be created for a sub-projet. The Bill Of Materials will > describe what the sub-project will deliver, and the tasks in the > project-plan describes how, who and when to deliver each item in the Bill Of > Materials. > > Torstein > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > Fra: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com] > Sendt: 17. juni 2009 02:00 > Til: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Emne: Re: ASF Board Report for 2009-06 > > I think it's a bit harder for the wiki part (we hage a project manager but > no wiki), thus need for requirements collection and > design thereafter > Anyway, David already sent his links... > > Jacques > > From: "Ean Schuessler" <e...@brainfood.com> >>I think the most reasonable first step would be for us to build >> importers that mirror the state of JIRA into OFBiz project management. >> All user accounts should be modeled as Party with the proper >> corresponding roles. Once we see that we can get to a parallel level of >> functionality we could then transition OFBiz development onto our own >> infrastructure. Achieving this result should speak more firmly about our >> intent than any spoken claim and will convince other Apache projects >> that we have the capability to execute on the plan. >> >> Hans Bakker wrote: >>> In general these subjects were handled by Tim, perhaps better he reacts >>> on that? >>> >>> i was referring to the last report about Infrastructure, shouldn't we >>> mention that we are now using contegix resources and are waiting for the >>> infrateam to respond? >>> >>> Then there was also a request to use ofbiz for the apache >>> administration/content management, shouldn't we say we are ready for >>> that and are interested to make ofbiz suitable for that? >>> >> >> > >
