GIT is really a very good tool. I use it locally and for other projects. However, it does change the work flow of development.
My 2 cents Raul On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:14:57 -0500 Ean Schuessler <e...@brainfood.com> wrote: > Adrian Crum wrote: > > I share some of the frustration Tim expressed, but at the same time > > I really appreciate the valuable contributions your company has > > made to the project. > > > > All I would ask is that you spend a little more time reviewing code > > and testing it before committing it. > Which brings up back to the value of the GIT-based pull-oriented > workflow. In the Linux kernel when someone has a feature they say > "people come checkout my repo for the cool thing I did" and people go > examine the work. The code doesn't go into someone's tree until they > already approve of it. If they have a complain they might say "fix X, > Y and Z and I will merge in your code". > > This way, if someone finds a "sloppier" workflow productive... so be > it. It may not get merged until they fix it up or someone works with > them to fix it up and it finally meets approval. The value is, people > who are not bothered by the sloppy workflow might work fast and loose > to prototype up some new feature.
