anyone interested? manuel. On 13 Dec 2009, at 01:27, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "David E Jones" <d...@me.com>On Dec 12, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote:That's silly, being useful for "everyone" has never been a requirement for a contribution... If Hans likes it enough to work on it, I see no reason for anyone to give him a hard time for it.Hans Bakker wrote:On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 13:59 +0100, Jeroen van der Wal wrote:Then we are getting into the discussion if ESME is useful or not. ThatHi Hans,I understand what it can do. Can you tell me why this feature shouldbe integrated into Ofbiz?is why i copied the first page in a previous message. Please checkearlier messages where i understood that in general the community agreedit was useful. This proposal is not that IF we should use ESME but only how....It is first if we can, then it is how. Things that go into ofbiz trunk must be useful for everyone, and you need to explain why this would be useful, and in which situations.-DavidYes, I don't see why this should be a requirement for a new feature.BTW it's a pity there is no PABX like Asterisks, but with an usable licence for usJacques
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature