right, this is really silly already! Manuel. On 13 Dec 2009, at 00:54, David E Jones wrote:
On Dec 12, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote:Hans Bakker wrote:On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 13:59 +0100, Jeroen van der Wal wrote:Hi Hans,I understand what it can do. Can you tell me why this feature shouldbe integrated into Ofbiz?Then we are getting into the discussion if ESME is useful or not. Thatis why i copied the first page in a previous message. Please checkearlier messages where i understood that in general the community agreedit was useful. This proposal is not that IF we should use ESME but only how....It is first if we can, then it is how. Things that go into ofbiz trunk must be useful for everyone, and you need to explain why this would be useful, and in which situations.That's silly, being useful for "everyone" has never been a requirement for a contribution...If Hans likes it enough to work on it, I see no reason for anyone to give him a hard time for it.-David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
