David E Jones wrote: > Bring confusion in the future? That's like saying you shouldn't use > the term object-relational mapping unless you're talking about JPA. > > Just like object-relational mapping is a general term with many > variations and implementations, and supporting the JPA interfaces is > simply a feature of some of those implementations, portal and > portlet are also general terms with many variations and > implementations, and only some of them support the JSR 168 > specification. > > Should we then say that portal/portlet software not written in Java > should not use those terms? > > If so, which terms should those unfortunate souls use to describe > their creations?
You should go work for sun(soon to be oracle) marketing. They'd love to have you on board.
