Those of us with strong Unix backgounds really don't want to see anything named "core" - so I'd say let's look for some other name. What you're pushing for Bruno - is much needed and could be a great enhancement to the usage of OFBiz. Anything that'll make it easier for people to build - non-eCommerce related applications without having to disable anything is a huge win in my book.
Cheers, Ruppert -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 On Jan 2, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: >> One major question is whether framework, on its own, should even be >> runnable as an application. In my opinion, it is a library, not an app >> and doesn't need to be operational on its own. > > The more we discuss about this the more I get convinced that what we > (or at least me) intend for framework-only distribution should be > better named "OFBiz-core". > The OFBiz-core could consist of framework + party + content + commonext. > > A distribution with these components set up is somewhat similar to > what I mean for a framework where developer can start building its > office automation application without the necessity to disable > anything but having all the power of the framework and the "core" > applications. > > -Bruno
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
