The only thing that's less low effort is that this keeps David having to mess with it - which is what I'm hoping to avoid. As I said before - it doesn't matter to me - this is just a super cheap way of doing things and puts the onus on the people who want to follow this one all the way thru.
The good thing - is regardless of which way David decides to go - I think we'll be able to support making it happen relatively quickly. Cheers, Ruppert On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote: > Tim Ruppert wrote: >> I guess I'd love to know why you're looking to pay $70+ for an interim >> solution when I can get do it for the community for just a few bucks and >> I'll likely be the one to help ensure that it actually gets pushed forward >> and maintained? Doesn't matter much to me, sounds like David should just >> put it up for auction - there seem to be a lot of people looking to spend >> money on it .... >> > I just figured David has been paying for it for some time and could use > a little reimbursement for his troubles. I agree with you that Network > Solutions prices are highway robbery. OpenSRS (TUCOWS) is cheaper as is > GoDaddy or a bunch of others but they all require some immediate effort. > I figured paying the $35 is the lowest effort way for David to keep the > domain secure until ASF-infra is ready to do something about it. He'd > get reimbursed and then some for his effort with my scheme. > > I do share your dislike for Network Solutions but what's $35 more bucks > in the larger picture? > > -- > Ean Schuessler, CTO > e...@brainfood.com > 214-720-0700 x 315 > Brainfood, Inc. > http://www.brainfood.com >
