Thanks for the update Tim.

It sounds like no matter what we're not going to see any quick action on this.

-David


On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:

> Here's the information from a thread between Shane, Upayavira, Jacopo and 
> myself.  Jacques and I also voted to make sure that it's setup before we 
> switch, but this should give you ample reason to believe what I wrote before. 
>  They are basically saying that we should keep it going before it gets lost 
> because they are not sure if they can dive in. 
> 
> There was another response saying that Upayavira might be able to help out 
> straight away - so maybe it's not such a big deal.  Again, putting the infra 
> in place and testing before we transfer is the best route IMO.
> 
> ---
> 
>> No worries man - but you are on all of those if you're still on the private 
>> lists - here is the info that I've seen on the infra list:
>> 
>> Sorry - too many mailing lists.  This is an action item for Jacopo and 
>> David, who should *extend the existing domain registration* for another year.
>> 
>> Then after the registration goes through, infra (thanks Upayavira!) needs to 
>> take the action (i.e. not trademarks@).
>> 
>> I entered a JIRA ticket to track this, which is Infra's preferred method for 
>> tracking things:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2625
>> 
>>> Upayavira,
>>> 
>>> please see my comments inline:
>>> 
>>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Jacopo,
>>>> 
>>>> I responded to this on trademarks@, but didn't CC, so I suspect you
>>>> didn't see my reply.
>>> 
>>> yes, I actually missed your reply, sorry for this.
>>> 
>>>> I said:
>>>> 
>>>> "I've just done a transfer for subversion, and would happily handle this
>>>> for you (but over at infrastructure@).
>>>> 
>>>> My guess though is that 20 days left is not enough - you'd have to wait
>>>> for probably a month after renewal.
>>> 
>>> It is fine even if the ofbiz.org domain is not reachable for some time; the 
>>> important thing is that the ASF get it before it is stolen by someone else.
>>> 
>>>> From what I've seen, renewing isn't
>>>> really a problem as you may well retain that period on your domain even
>>>> when transferred over to the Apache registrar's account."
>>>> 
>>>> So basically, I doubt the registrar would allow you to transfer at this
>>>> point anyhow.
>>>> 
>>>> As I said, I'm happy to help you with the migration. We can co-ordinate
>>>> a time between us to attempt it, and I can do any necessary
>>>> co-ordination with infra to make sure everything goes right.
>>> 
>>> Perfect! Just let me know exactly what information you need from us and we 
>>> will do all the required steps.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> My main question is what do you want the domain once transferred.
>>>> Serving the site off ofbiz.org I suspect would be a no-go. Having
>>>> ofbiz.org redirect to ofbiz.apache.org would be exactly the preferred
>>>> option.
>>> 
>>> This is exactly what we would like to have: ofbiz.org should simply 
>>> redirect to ofbiz.apache.org
>>> Our main concern is that we want to be sure that ASF takes ownership of the 
>>> ofbiz.org domain, before it is taken by a third party non part of the 
>>> community.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> So, let me know how/when you want to proceed.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> Jacopo
>> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Ruppert
> 
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 11:52 AM, David E Jones wrote:
> 
>> 
>> As much as I'd like to take your word on all of this Tim, I know that at 
>> least the part related to me isn't correct. Could you forward some of the 
>> emails you've received about this? Aside from an email that just came 
>> through, I haven't even seen anything on the private mailing list... and 
>> that makes communication problems more likely.
>> 
>> -David
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>> 
>>> Here's the latest update from Infra at the ASF:
>>> 
>>> 1. They will be happy to migrate the ofbiz.org domain.
>>> 2. They have recommended that we not transfer it to them right away
>>> - But instead either reup it where it is or migrate it to someone who can 
>>> manage it
>>> 3. The reason is that it will take a while for them to migrate all of the 
>>> services :(
>>> - This will be important IMO.
>>> - The services that would be migrated would be:
>>> -- DNS
>>> -- Apache redirects
>>> 4. Getting services in place before we move to the ASF.
>>> - I think this is important because due to propagation, we would have 
>>> everything already setup.
>>> - This will lead to less headaches.
>>> 
>>> Because David does not want to be in the middle of this, my vote would 
>>> still be to transfer the domain to someone like Jacopo since he's the PMC 
>>> chair.  He gets the domain reup at really cheap prices, he has access to 
>>> keep the services exactly as they are today and can get the information to 
>>> the ASF, and there's no chance that he'd do something devious with the 
>>> domain.  
>>> 
>>> David, if you are interested in this, please think about it and let us all 
>>> know - this will ensure that services do not go down for anyone involved - 
>>> and Jacopo can manage migrating it to the ASF once the DNS and apache host 
>>> files are already in place.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ruppert
>>> 
>>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 17, 2010, at 7:05 AM, David E Jones wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Wow, this discussion has really taken on a life of its own.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maybe I wasn't clear enough before... the $35 or somehow saving me some 
>>>>> effort in continuing to do things the old way is not the point, the point 
>>>>> is to get this onto ASF infra ASAP just like all other resources. It 
>>>>> would be way easier to click a few buttons but that wouldn't resolve the 
>>>>> issue with ofbiz.org that some individual owns the domain and that the 
>>>>> DNS is still hosted by a third party (ie Contegix).
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Yes this makes a lot of sense to me; let's see if the Infra can take 
>>>> action quickly (the ball is already in their court) and if not let's find 
>>>> another good solution together.
>>>> 
>>>>> On the other hand, the whole auctioning idea for the domain name is 
>>>>> interesting... do I hear $1000? One thousand to the respectable lady in 
>>>>> front. Do I hear $1500? Fifteen hundred to the gentleman in the t-shirt 
>>>>> and shorts. Let's get this really going! Do I hear $5000? Amazing folks! 
>>>>> Five thousand to the man in the suit with the hat with red lettering on 
>>>>> it that I can't quite make out from here... looks like it starts with an 
>>>>> "O" and is in all caps. Going once... going twice... sold! A special 
>>>>> thanks to all involved, and to the man who... wait... wow again! I've 
>>>>> just been informed that ofbiz.org and sun.com are now under the same 
>>>>> umbrella... who could have imagined!  ;)
>>>> 
>>>> This is really great!
>>>> BTW thank you David for bringing up this important topic.
>>>> 
>>>> Jacopo
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -David
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The only thing that's less low effort is that this keeps David having to 
>>>>>> mess with it - which is what I'm hoping to avoid.  As I said before - it 
>>>>>> doesn't matter to me - this is just a super cheap way of doing things 
>>>>>> and puts the onus on the people who want to follow this one all the way 
>>>>>> thru.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The good thing - is regardless of which way David decides to go - I 
>>>>>> think we'll be able to support making it happen relatively quickly.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>>>>>>> I guess I'd love to know why you're looking to pay $70+ for an interim 
>>>>>>>> solution when I can get do it for the community for just a few bucks 
>>>>>>>> and I'll likely be the one to help ensure that it actually gets pushed 
>>>>>>>> forward and maintained?  Doesn't matter much to me, sounds like David 
>>>>>>>> should just put it up for auction - there seem to be a lot of people 
>>>>>>>> looking to spend money on it ....
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I just figured David has been paying for it for some time and could use
>>>>>>> a little reimbursement for his troubles. I agree with you that Network
>>>>>>> Solutions prices are highway robbery. OpenSRS (TUCOWS) is cheaper as is
>>>>>>> GoDaddy or a bunch of others but they all require some immediate effort.
>>>>>>> I figured paying the $35 is the lowest effort way for David to keep the
>>>>>>> domain secure until ASF-infra is ready to do something about it. He'd
>>>>>>> get reimbursed and then some for his effort with my scheme.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I do share your dislike for Network Solutions but what's $35 more bucks
>>>>>>> in the larger picture?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Ean Schuessler, CTO
>>>>>>> e...@brainfood.com
>>>>>>> 214-720-0700 x 315
>>>>>>> Brainfood, Inc.
>>>>>>> http://www.brainfood.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to