yes, I will do. Jacopo
On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Pretty logical, I see. Maybe Jacopo will consider it? > > Thanks > > Jacques > > From: "BJ Freeman" <bjf...@free-man.net> >> never saw it as enhanced only following the Data model book. >> since most told me that features were not complete in ofbiz, I completed >> them. >> Since most of my discussion were ignored I just made my own, using the OOTB >> as a basis. >> I use what I can of the svn and add on top the way I see it. >> ========================= >> BJ Freeman >> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> Linkedin >> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> >> Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 7/2/2010 10:26 AM: >>> Interesting, so you enhanced the OOTB model and actions, right? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "BJ Freeman" <bjf...@free-man.net> >>>> I used the model on page 146 >>>> and the example agreementID 10002 >>>> since the Agreement has the product agreement, the service matches the >>>> product agreement productID and updates the orderitem orderterms(page >>>> 128) and table 4.9(page 129) . an SECA checks that the order terms can >>>> be accepted based on the order, like a promo may be disqualified based >>>> on the order terms. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ========================= >>>> BJ Freeman >>>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >>>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>> >>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>> >>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>> Linkedin >>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/2/2010 3:26 AM: >>>>> When an order is initiated, it is possible to select an agreement >>>>> that will govern the orders (OrderTerms are cloned from >>>>> AgreementTerms, if the agreement has a price list then the agreement >>>>> prices are used in place of ProductPrice); however the agreementId is >>>>> only added to the cart but it is lost when the order is saved. >>>>> This causes issues if the order is edited: the agreement is lost and >>>>> the system is unable to apply the agreement prices to the edited order. >>>>> >>>>> The solution I am proposing is to add the agreementId field to >>>>> OrderHeader entity. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
