I did not relate and order directly with an agreement so that the order
terms were free to me changed on the spot so to speak.
These are know as exceptions and need to be approved, like say in a
retail establishment where a manager has to approve anything not based
on the rules.
the also allows more freedom as to business rules.
=========================
BJ Freeman <http://bjfreeman.elance.com>
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Scott Gray sent the following on 7/3/2010 12:36 AM:
Hi Jacopo,
Not sure if this is of any use to you:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/orders-and-contracts-td2248364.html#a2248394
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 3/07/2010, at 6:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
yes, I will do.
Jacopo
On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Pretty logical, I see. Maybe Jacopo will consider it?
Thanks
Jacques
From: "BJ Freeman"<bjf...@free-man.net>
never saw it as enhanced only following the Data model book.
since most told me that features were not complete in ofbiz, I completed them.
Since most of my discussion were ignored I just made my own, using the OOTB as
a basis.
I use what I can of the svn and add on top the way I see it.
=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier
Automation<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 7/2/2010 10:26 AM:
Interesting, so you enhanced the OOTB model and actions, right?
Jacques
From: "BJ Freeman"<bjf...@free-man.net>
I used the model on page 146
and the example agreementID 10002
since the Agreement has the product agreement, the service matches the
product agreement productID and updates the orderitem orderterms(page
128) and table 4.9(page 129) . an SECA checks that the order terms can
be accepted based on the order, like a promo may be disqualified based
on the order terms.
=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/2/2010 3:26 AM:
When an order is initiated, it is possible to select an agreement
that will govern the orders (OrderTerms are cloned from
AgreementTerms, if the agreement has a price list then the agreement
prices are used in place of ProductPrice); however the agreementId is
only added to the cart but it is lost when the order is saved.
This causes issues if the order is edited: the agreement is lost and
the system is unable to apply the agreement prices to the edited order.
The solution I am proposing is to add the agreementId field to
OrderHeader entity.
What do you think?
Jacopo
