Good evening, BJ i'm on you're site. During the migration i tried to keep the old behavior. So if you're using standard components from the UI you're instances shouldn't be effected. And let me say that a few (UI) features, after the migration, are more stable and faster than the old once (i.e. the lookups). Another side point to merge in the next days is, that i have this month free time to fix bugs (which maybe occurs :-))
2010/12/3 BJ Freeman <bjf...@free-man.net> > ofbiz is to me is versatility with letting different implementation work > side by side. > the core is that the entities when modified will display at UI level with > no other changes to code. If you add a field at entity level that field will > display at the UI level with no more work. > > So as long as any effort keeps that philosophy then I have no problem. > and as long as I can continued to work on my production servers without > major changes, then I am ok with it. > > For those that want to change this, I suggest a different effort so they > can resolve their requirement but not effect the basic philosophy of ofbiz > design. > > > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation < > http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > > > Karl Pitrich sent the following on 12/3/2010 7:49 AM: > > I understand that a lot of people have a stake in OfBiz, but for the sake >> of advancement of the project I strongly believe that a clear and quick >> decision is necessary, even when it breaks functionality. >> >> > -- Sascha Rodekamp Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de
