Hi Bruno, I guess I missed your original email but what was the reason for creating a new release branch outside of our normal schedule?
Personally I don't see any reason why we can't just merge the jquery branch and carry on as normal. If people choose to develop custom projects against the trunk then good for them but I don't think we need to consider that when making decisions on moving the trunk forward. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 3/12/2010, at 6:59 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: > Why you think that making a new release branch would create a fork? > It will be managed as we manage R10.04 and R9.04 right now. > Only bug fixes will be backported. > > -Bruno > > > 2010/12/2 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > >> Ryan Foster wrote: >> >>> What about creating a tag or branch before the merge so that users who >>> have custom projects or applications based on the trunk >>> have a reference point in the event that they want to freeze their >>> applications at a particular revision? >>> >> >> Yes, that's what I have proposed. With another option: to have a branch. >> But I think the later is more a fork and I prefer the 1st. >> >> >> Oh and +1 on merging in JQuery. I am all for consolidating/simplifying >>> our Javascript libraries. No reason to have 3 libraries >>> that all essentially do the same thing. In the end, Javascript is >>> Javascript. My heart says we should have chosen Prototype as >>> that one (as anyone who knows me would agree, I'm a big Prototype JS >>> evangelist). But, my head says that JQuery is the right >>> choice for the long-term growth and success of the project, as it has >>> definitely become the drug of choice for a majority of >>> developers and has much more wide-spread community involvement as far as >>> development of plugins is concerned. >>> >> >> I think we now all agree on that >> >> Jacques >> >> >> Ryan L. Foster >>> 801.671.0769 >>> cont...@ryanlfoster.com >>> >>> On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>> I'm sorry for Bruno, but it seems everybody is looking forward for this >>>> merging. So hopefully I will do it soon. >>>> If you are interested you can already check >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814 >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> Michael Xu (xudong) wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're welcome >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES < >>>>>> erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Other opinions, ideas? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> The sooner the better ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Erwan de FERRIERES >>>>>>> www.nereide.biz >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
