Apache LABS could be utilised for such. That way persons can work on it, without hindrance of the projects by-laws and policies and without crowded our repository with branches having a limited lifespan (such as PoCs normally are intended). See http://labs.apache.org/
Best regards. Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Scott Gray <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > -1 > > I think plenty of people are in favor of the concept (including me) but a > vote on replacing framework (and I assume eventually rewriting all of the > applications) is premature. Has anyone looked into was is involved? With > the level of interest from the community I think a POC of some sort is the > best first step before we can hope to make an informed decision. > > Regards > Scott > On 27 Apr 2015 02:45, "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> > wrote: > > > As was discussed last week, there is some interest in replacing some (or > > all) of OFBiz with Moqui (http://www.moqui.org/framework/index.html). > > > > To the scope reasonable, I propose that we begin by converting the > > following parts of the OFBiz framework with Moqui: > > > > Entity Engine > > Service Engine > > Security > > > > Other parts of the OFBiz framework could be converted as well, but I > think > > this would be a good starting point, and if is successful, then more of > > OFBiz can be converted later. > > > > I believe we can create a thunk component to help solve compatibility > > problems, but that is a separate discussion. I only mention it here in > case > > compatibility concerns might influence a vote. > > > > -- > > Adrian Crum > > Sandglass Software > > www.sandglass-software.com > > >
