On Apr 30, 2015, at 11:12 PM, David E. Jones <d...@me.com> wrote: > > This doesn’t seem to represent the responses very well. My vote shouldn’t be > considered a +1 unless my interpretation of the proposal (as a PoC in a > branch) was correct, and I saw no comment on that… in fact from this message > it seems that is explicitly NOT what the vote was supposed to be about based > on the comment that doing a PoC in a branch requires no vote. >
I had the same thought: for example, I didn't understand why David's and my vote have been classified as +1 and -1 respectively when I have clearly mentioned: "+1 to this proposal by David". Jacopo > Overall the vote proposal and discussion thread was very confusing, I don’t > see how you could get any sort of vote count out of it… most people replied > with multiple votes with different clarifications! > > This VOTE RESULT never should have been done, the vote should simply have > been cancelled or reframed. > > -David > > >> On 30 Apr 2015, at 00:55, Adrian Crum <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> >> wrote: >> >> Here is the tally of the votes. This was a challenge because many replies >> included votes for other things, so this tally represents my best effort at >> counting votes for the original subject. >> >> PMC Members (Binding) >> --------------------- >> +0 | 2 (Adam Heath, Jacques Le Roux) >> +1 | 1 (David Jones) >> -1 | 3 (Nicolas Malin, Scott Gray, Jacopo Cappellato) >> >> >> Others (non-Binding) >> -------------------- >> +0 | 1 (Adrian Crum) >> -1 | 2 (Ron Wheeler, Martin Becker) >> >> The vote failed to pass with 3 -1 votes and 1 +1 vote. >> >> The replies included a discussion about creating a POC branch to explore the >> subject further. That can be done without a vote, so I will consider this >> vote closed. >> >> >> Adrian Crum >> Sandglass Software >> www.sandglass-software.com >> >> On 4/26/2015 3:44 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >>> As was discussed last week, there is some interest in replacing some (or >>> all) of OFBiz with Moqui (http://www.moqui.org/framework/index.html). >>> >>> To the scope reasonable, I propose that we begin by converting the >>> following parts of the OFBiz framework with Moqui: >>> >>> Entity Engine >>> Service Engine >>> Security >>> >>> Other parts of the OFBiz framework could be converted as well, but I >>> think this would be a good starting point, and if is successful, then >>> more of OFBiz can be converted later. >>> >>> I believe we can create a thunk component to help solve compatibility >>> problems, but that is a separate discussion. I only mention it here in >>> case compatibility concerns might influence a vote. >>> >
