Advance cast of -1 in case I miss the vote if it ever comes. Moqui is it's own eco-system. The only way to "replace the framework with Moqui" is to rewrite the apps to be moqui apps. If that was done, what does it have to do with OFBiz@Apache? We could rename the project to Apps for Moqui and become application curators and essentially be a different project. But what's the point of doing that here rather than over at moqui? (wherever "at moqui" is)
The work I think Adrian is suggesting is introducing Moqui as some sort of hybrid into OFBiz until we can phase out the OFBiz framework completely. To me that seems like a convoluted way to go instead of just rewriting the apps. Regards Scott On 27 April 2015 at 02:11, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > On Apr 26, 2015, at 3:09 PM, Adrian Crum < > adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote: > > > How about "Replace framework core functionality - like entity engine, > service engine, and security with Moqui." > > > > Is that specific enough? > > > > Not really: we have talked about bringing the whole Moqui codebase into > the OFBiz trunk (bad idea in my opinion), or migrating the applications to > Moqui, or reimplementing them and the sentence above doesn't specify a > direction. > And why entity engine, service and security and not for example > transaction management, connection pooling, ui technology, logging etc...? > > Jacopo > > > Adrian Crum > > Sandglass Software > > www.sandglass-software.com > > > > On 4/26/2015 1:47 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >> The discussion is interesting and fascinating but in this thread > completely different ideas have been expressed: from forking Moqui into > OFBiz to rewriting OFBiz applications from scratch on top of Moqui etc... > >> > >> My vote will be negative if the vote will be as generic as "replace > OFBiz framework with Moqui" is because it would not be an actionable item > and there could be 1000 totally different ways to implement it. > >> > >> Jacopo > >> > >> > >> On Apr 26, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Adrian Crum < > adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote: > >> > >>> This has been discussed for nearly a week now. Shall we start a vote? > >>> > >>> Adrian Crum > >>> Sandglass Software > >>> www.sandglass-software.com > >>> > >>> On 4/20/2015 6:31 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >>>> Again, as discussed at the ApacheCon in Austin we should start setting > >>>> up a plan how to best move the ERP application to the Moqui framework. > >>>> Moqui should not be part of the Apache foundation however the ERP > >>>> application should remain there. > >>>> > >>>> Not only will it improve development of the ERP system but also will > >>>> establish a clean separation between application and frameworks and > >>>> hopefully getting David Jones back into the project. > >>>> > >>>> Yes, I realize i open the pandora box :-) but we need to make some > major > >>>> decisions.... > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Hans Bakker > >>>> antwebsystems.com > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >
