Hi Nicolas,

I think If your finger hurts you don't cut it off. The project has too many
pages, documentations, email threads and time dedicated to the special
purpose components. They existed for a long, long time in the history of
OFBiz.

Some attempts were made in the past to reduce the size of the framework and
release 13.07 is a prime example of these attempts which failed IMHO. This
is a reason why, for example, a rewrite of the framework is being discussed
in the community.

I would suggest to you that to get really lean and clean, we need to work
on the root of the problem which is the design of the framework and its
architecture. We need a _plugin_ implementation that achieves _loose
coupling_ of the components in a way that sustains the quality of the code
while at the same time allowing a small framework core to thrive. Take a
look at this thread <http://ofbiz.markmail.org/thread/7bipnq3ffoteliff> in
which we discussed this issue and suggested one of several strategies.
There are other threads which I cannot recall at the moment.

For the record, I totally agree with keeping a small core and a lean
framework, It's how we get there that I'm worried about and I would suggest
to you that we do this in a well thought out and gradual process.

My 2 cents

Taher Alkhateeb

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr>
wrote:

> Le 10/11/2015 05:54, slidingfilame...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
>> This topic was heavily discussed in the past and I think a solution like
>> turning off the components is very quick indeed but not ideal.
>>
>
> Completely, I'm sure a better ideal exist but difficult to reach.
>
> A second step, easy to reach would be enable a specialpurpose directly by
> an ant target :
> $ ant load-component -D"component=ecommerce" load-demo start
> or
> $ ant load-component -D"components=ecommerce projectmgr myportal"
> load-demo start
>
> This help beginner through easy command line to copy/past from
> documentation or expert by scripting to configure ofbiz.
>
> Nicolas
>
>

Reply via email to