My opinion is we should do so for concerned component but not all others
blindly. For instance the POS it out of scope and so are many others.
So we should better name those which are concerned, current or future...
Jacques
Le 19/11/2015 14:36, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
I was actually thinking to Birt as an example of this behavior: but in the
future we may add other special purpose applications that need to override
applications screens (in fact overriding screens and other artifacts to
specialize them is a best practice in OFBiz) and the problem will happen
again if we keep them all enabled.
Jacopo
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Could we list, apart the well known Birt issue, special components which
are overriding main applications?
Then depending on cases we could be more surgical...
Jacques
Le 19/11/2015 09:46, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
I agree with Taher when he says that we should strive to move small steps
in the direction of having a lean lightweight framework with pluggable
components.
But I think that Nicolas' proposal is actually one of these steps.
The fact that currently some of our specialized components are overriding
the more generic behavior of other components (e.g. the ones under
"applications") is a problem that we have to fix asap.
Otherwise the default demo of OFBiz will only showcase the more
specialized
behaviors; for example, if tomorrow we will add a new special purpose
component for a niche industry, that will override the application screens
with industry specific ones from that day on all OFBiz users that will
download and run OFBiz will have the impression that OFBiz was designed
for
one specific industry only.
Nicolas' proposal addresses this issue and still leaves the ability to the
interested users to manually enable the components they need.
Jacopo
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Taher Alkhateeb <
slidingfilame...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
I think If your finger hurts you don't cut it off. The project has too
many
pages, documentations, email threads and time dedicated to the special
purpose components. They existed for a long, long time in the history of
OFBiz.
Some attempts were made in the past to reduce the size of the framework
and
release 13.07 is a prime example of these attempts which failed IMHO.
This
is a reason why, for example, a rewrite of the framework is being
discussed
in the community.
I would suggest to you that to get really lean and clean, we need to work
on the root of the problem which is the design of the framework and its
architecture. We need a _plugin_ implementation that achieves _loose
coupling_ of the components in a way that sustains the quality of the
code
while at the same time allowing a small framework core to thrive. Take a
look at this thread <http://ofbiz.markmail.org/thread/7bipnq3ffoteliff>
in
which we discussed this issue and suggested one of several strategies.
There are other threads which I cannot recall at the moment.
For the record, I totally agree with keeping a small core and a lean
framework, It's how we get there that I'm worried about and I would
suggest
to you that we do this in a well thought out and gradual process.
My 2 cents
Taher Alkhateeb
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Nicolas Malin <
nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr>
wrote:
Le 10/11/2015 05:54, slidingfilame...@gmail.com a écrit :
This topic was heavily discussed in the past and I think a solution like
turning off the components is very quick indeed but not ideal.
Completely, I'm sure a better ideal exist but difficult to reach.
A second step, easy to reach would be enable a specialpurpose directly
by
an ant target :
$ ant load-component -D"component=ecommerce" load-demo start
or
$ ant load-component -D"components=ecommerce projectmgr myportal"
load-demo start
This help beginner through easy command line to copy/past from
documentation or expert by scripting to configure ofbiz.
Nicolas
