Hey Tom - where are we at on the book? did you move forward with it? Cheers
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Tom Barber <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 7:38 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: OODT book proposal >Thanks Chris. > >Eva, I think we can probably include that stuff within one of the existing >tutorial sections as your ideas aren't too crazy ;) > >Tom > >On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < >[email protected]> wrote: > >> you have to have a chapter on NASA earth science missions :) >> I added it..good luck! >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Tom Barber [[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 2:52 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: OODT book proposal >> >> Alright chaps this is pretty last minute as I have to chat to the guy >>from >> Manning tomorrow so if anyone has 5 minutes, can you scan: >> >> >>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dGVf0j25WzXZCyTyuX9aMmmQ06yAPLOFtuTFZ >>e-0aXk/edit?usp=sharing >> and add anything you think is missing. The link is open to all so you >> should be able to add/change entries, just italicise them or something >>so I >> can spot them. >> >> Thanks >> >> Tom >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Thanks for the feedback guys. >> > >> > The chat I had with the chap was certainly around a full book as I >>have >> to >> > pitch 9 - 14 chapters. He did say they are trying to move away from >> generic >> > platform books so I think pitching it in the style of a look at all >>the >> > main components and heavy on the real world how-to and use cases >>would be >> > the way I'm tending to go along with a load of stuff on the value of >> > metadata etc. >> > >> > We discussed use case ideas and I went over some of the crazy NASA >>stuff >> > which he said I should include and also a bunch of real world use >> > cases(smart meters/regulatory compliance application and stuff from my >> day >> > job), but of course, you lot don't live in the real world so you'll >>have >> to >> > leave that to me ;) >> > >> > On 1.0 I'm sure it will come out during the time we would spend >>writing a >> > book. >> > >> > I'll come back with a draft toc tonight or tomorrow and those >>interested >> > can add their 10 cents. >> > >> > Tom >> > On 20 May 2015 18:26, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" >><[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Spoke to Tom White a while ago @ApacheCon about this very topic folks >> with >> >> one interesting outcome. >> >> Many publishers (I don't know about Manning, however Chris will >>likely >> >> know) are interested in Microbooks or picket guides as well. >> >> An example is the following >> >> http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596007430.do >> >> I don't know if this fits for something like OODT but you guys can >> >> consider. >> >> Lewis >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Chris Mattmann < >> >> [email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Thanks Mike. I don’t think 1.0 is required >> >> > *before* writing the book, but can happen >> >> > while the book is going on (and be pushed in >> >> > many cases by the book!) :) >> >> > >> >> > We had the same scenario with Tika in Action. >> >> > >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > Chris >> >> > >> >> > ------------------------ >> >> > Chris Mattmann >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> >> > From: Michael Starch <[email protected]> >> >> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> >> >> > Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 10:10 AM >> >> > To: <[email protected]> >> >> > Subject: Re: OODT book proposal >> >> > >> >> > >I am definitely up for this. Are we going to push for an OODT-1.0 >> >> > >"polished" released before we write a book? There seem to be a >>lot >> of >> >> > >very >> >> > >nice features in the pipe, which will affect the content of a >>book. >> >> > > >> >> > >Regardless, I believe the following may be helpful for the book. >> >> > > >> >> > > - Setting Up OODT >> >> > > - Major OODT Components >> >> > > - Extending OODT >> >> > > - OODT in Operations >> >> > > >> >> > >-Michael >> >> > > >> >> > >On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Freeborn, Dana J (398G) < >> >> > >[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > >> Hi Tom, >> >> > >> >> >> > >> This is great. I would be happy to contribute to the book if my >> >> level >> >> > >>of >> >> > >> experience with OODT (which is high) is helpful. It's not >>clear to >> >> me >> >> > >>your >> >> > >> focus for the book, so you'll just have to tap me if I can >> >> contribute. >> >> > >> Paul and Chris will know if I do. Otherwise, I will cheer on >>your >> >> > >> efforts. :-) >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Thanks, >> >> > >> Dana >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> From: Tom Barber >> >> > >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> > >> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < >> >> > >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> > >> Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 2:02 AM >> >> > >> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >> >> > >><[email protected] >> >> > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> > >> Subject: OODT book proposal >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Hi guys, >> >> > >> >> >> > >> I was on the phone to Manning today about an OODT book that me, >> Chris >> >> > >>and >> >> > >> Mike Starch mulled over in Texas. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> I've been tasked with coming up with a TOC as the proposal so >>I'll >> >> knock >> >> > >> something together and share it later in the week, but on this >> topic. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> a) Does anyone have anything they'd especially like to see in an >> OODT >> >> > >>book? >> >> > >> b) Does anyone want to help donate some hours writing a bit of >>the >> >> book >> >> > >> (won't be any time soon and takes months so don't worry about >>it, >> >> and I >> >> > >> wont hold you to it, just looking for interest) >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Tom >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> *Lewis* >> >> >> > >>
